Carol Chillington Rutter
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Education
- History top 10%
- Topics
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (11 papers)Theatre and Performance Studies (3 papers)Reflective Practices in Education (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
Carol Chillington Rutter
12 papers receiving 78 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Literature and Literary Theory 80
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 40
- Sociology and Political Science 22
- Education 21
- History 18
Countries citing papers authored by Carol Chillington Rutter
This map shows the geographic impact of Carol Chillington Rutter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carol Chillington Rutter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carol Chillington Rutter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Carol Chillington Rutter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carol Chillington Rutter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carol Chillington Rutter. The network helps show where Carol Chillington Rutter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carol Chillington Rutter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carol Chillington Rutter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carol Chillington Rutter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carol Chillington Rutter. Carol Chillington Rutter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | The Henry VI plays | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | Learning Thisby's Part-or-What's Hecuba to Him? | 3 |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | Enter The Body: Women and Representation on Shakespeare's Stage | 31 |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | Shakespeare and Child's Play: Performing Lost Boys on Stage and Screen | 8 |
About Carol Chillington Rutter
Carol Chillington Rutter is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Music and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 21 papers that have together received 128 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (11 papers), Theatre and Performance Studies (3 papers) and Reflective Practices in Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (40 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (80 citations) and Music (13 citations). Carol Chillington Rutter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include R. A. Foakes, Jon Heron, Nick Monk, Jonothan Neelands, Harriet S. Walter and Tony Harrison. Their work appears in journals such as World Literature Today, Shakespeare Quarterly and Renaissance and Reformation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.