Freedom to learn :a view of what education might become
- Authors
- Carl R. Rogers
- Journal
- Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w8334298 →Countries where authors are citing Freedom to learn :a view of what education might become
This map shows the geographic impact of Freedom to learn :a view of what education might become. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Freedom to learn :a view of what education might become with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Freedom to learn :a view of what education might become more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Freedom to learn :a view of what education might become
This network shows the impact of Freedom to learn :a view of what education might become. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Freedom to learn :a view of what education might become.
About Freedom to learn :a view of what education might become
This paper, published in 1969, received 282 indexed citations . Written by Carl R. Rogers covering the research area of Education, Information Systems and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (160 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (55 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (35 citations). Published in Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w8334298.