Carl Cederström

591 total citations
18 papers, 332 citations indexed

About

Carl Cederström is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Carl Cederström has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 332 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 4 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Carl Cederström's work include Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers), Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (4 papers) and Management Theory and Practice (2 papers). Carl Cederström is often cited by papers focused on Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers), Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (4 papers) and Management Theory and Practice (2 papers). Carl Cederström collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Sweden. Carl Cederström's co-authors include André Spicer, Casper Hoedemaekers, Peter Fleming, Peter Bloom, Mike Marinetto, Simon Critchley and Thomas Kalling and has published in prestigious journals such as Organization Studies, Sociology and Organization.

In The Last Decade

Carl Cederström

17 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers

Carl Cederström
Bogdan Costea United Kingdom
Edward Wray‐Bliss United Kingdom
Karyn Stapleton United Kingdom
Sammy Toyoki Finland
Kathie L. Pelletier United States
Ellen V. Rubin United States
Donald L. Kanter United States
Carl Cederström
Citations per year, relative to Carl Cederström Carl Cederström (= 1×) peers Eugène Enriquez

Countries citing papers authored by Carl Cederström

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carl Cederström's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carl Cederström with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carl Cederström more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carl Cederström

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carl Cederström. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carl Cederström. The network helps show where Carl Cederström may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carl Cederström

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carl Cederström. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carl Cederström based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carl Cederström. Carl Cederström is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Cederström, Carl & André Spicer. (2017). Going public. Organization. 24(5). 708–711. 7 indexed citations
2.
Cederström, Carl & André Spicer. (2017). Desperately Seeking Self-Improvement: A Year Inside the Optimization Movement. 2 indexed citations
3.
Cederström, Carl & Peter Fleming. (2016). On Bandit Organizations and Their (IL)Legitimacy: Concept Development and Illustration. Organization Studies. 37(11). 1575–1594. 11 indexed citations
4.
Marinetto, Mike, et al.. (2015). The Academic as Public Intellectual: Examining Public Engagement in the Professionalised Academy. Sociology. 49(6). 1031–1046. 27 indexed citations
5.
Spicer, André & Carl Cederström. (2015). Under the whip of wellness. The New Scientist. 225(3009). 26–27. 1 indexed citations
6.
Cederström, Carl & André Spicer. (2015). The Wellness Syndrome. 61 indexed citations
7.
Cederström, Carl & André Spicer. (2013). Discourse of the real kind: A post-foundational approach to organizational discourse analysis. Organization. 21(2). 178–205. 50 indexed citations
8.
Cederström, Carl & Mike Marinetto. (2013). Corporate social responsibility á la the liberal communist. Organization. 20(3). 416–432. 13 indexed citations
9.
Cederström, Carl & Peter Fleming. (2012). Dead Man Working. 43 indexed citations
10.
Cederström, Carl & Casper Hoedemaekers. (2012). On dead dogs and unwritten jokes: Life in the university today. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 28(3). 229–233. 18 indexed citations
11.
Critchley, Simon, et al.. (2011). Impossible Objects: Interviews. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 5 indexed citations
12.
Critchley, Simon & Carl Cederström. (2010). How to stop living and start worrying: Conversations with Carl Cederström. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 3 indexed citations
13.
Hoedemaekers, Casper & Carl Cederström. (2010). Lacan and organization. 49 indexed citations
14.
Cederström, Carl. (2009). Lacan Goes Business. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 1 indexed citations
15.
Bloom, Peter & Carl Cederström. (2009). “The sky's the limit”: fantasy in the age of market rationality. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 22(2). 159–180. 31 indexed citations
16.
Cederström, Carl, et al.. (2008). The Masochistic Reflexive Turn. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 7 indexed citations
17.
Cederström, Carl. (2007). The Lacanian Left Does Not Exist. 2 indexed citations
18.
Cederström, Carl & Thomas Kalling. (2005). Technology implementation: A qualitative case study of e-procurement. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026