C V Clark

768 citations
21 papers · 340 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

C V Clark

21 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

C V Clark
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Ophthalmology 188
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 43
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 99
  • Neurology 41
  • Neurology 18
Replace L N Johnson with:
L N Johnson United States
I. Baldissera Austria
Behnam Mansouri Iran
Reiko Takeshima Japan
Vinod K. Grover India
Armin Farajzadeh Deroee United States
Christian Verborgh Belgium
Akifumi Kanai Japan
Shigeo Ohmura Japan
D A Mulholland United Kingdom
C V Clark relative to L N Johnson United States L N Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
L N Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C V Clark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C V Clark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C V Clark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C V Clark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C V Clark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C V Clark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C V Clark. The network helps show where C V Clark may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside C V Clark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C V Clark Line = papers co-authored together C V Clark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199067
2 198562
3 198537
4 198529
5 199025
6
The prevalence of autonomic neuropathy in glaucoma.
198521
7 199016
8 198612
9
Pupil cycle time in primary closed-angle glaucoma.
198612
10 198711
11 198910
12 19899
13
Parasympathetic denervation hypersensitivity of the iris in ocular hypertension.
19878
14 19866
15 19835
16 19934
17 19892
18 19901
19 19901
20 19911

About C V Clark

C V Clark is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (13 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (3 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (3 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (2 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (2 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (2 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers) and Neurological Disorders and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (188 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (43 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (99 citations), Neurology (41 citations) and Neurology (18 citations). C V Clark has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include R Mapstone, A. D. MACLEOD, A. J. Asbury, M J Brodie, John Newsom–Davis, M D Sanders, David W. Hill, C I Phillips, R S Bartholomew and Jaffar Allawi. Their work appears in journals such as Eye, Documenta Ophthalmologica, Anaesthesia, Clinical Science and British Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact