M J Brodie
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Oncology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Elaine A. WilsonG. J. A. MacpheeA. J. AsburyRuth GillhamMichael MooreElaine ButlerGeoff ThompsonA. Goldberg
- Topics
- Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (15 papers)Epilepsy research and treatment (13 papers)Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Psychiatry and Mental healthPediatrics, Perinatology and Child HealthAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyCanada
In The Last Decade
M J Brodie
32 papers receiving 912 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 488
- Psychiatry and Mental health 392
- Molecular Biology 229
- Oncology 177
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 132
Countries citing papers authored by M J Brodie
This map shows the geographic impact of M J Brodie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M J Brodie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M J Brodie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M J Brodie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M J Brodie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M J Brodie. The network helps show where M J Brodie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M J Brodie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M J Brodie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M J Brodie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M J Brodie. M J Brodie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 68 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | New antiepileptic drugs. | 27 |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 43 | |
| 10 | 67 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 72 | |
| 14 | 55 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | First-pass metabolism. | 16 |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 40 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About M J Brodie
M J Brodie is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pharmacology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 974 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (15 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (13 papers) and Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (392 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (488 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (81 citations). M J Brodie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Elaine A. Wilson, G. J. A. Macphee, A. J. Asbury, Ruth Gillham, Michael Moore, Elaine Butler, Geoff Thompson, A. Goldberg, John G. Larkin and G G Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Gut and Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.