Brigitte Poppenberger
- Plant Science top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Food Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Wilfried RozhonDianna J. BowlesEng‐Kiat LimSimon Josef UnterholznerFabián E. VaistijTobias SiebererGerhard AdamMamoona Khan
- Topics
- Plant Molecular Biology Research (28 papers)Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (13 papers)Plant Reproductive Biology (11 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Biological ChemistryNature Communications
- Partner nations
- GermanyAustriaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Brigitte Poppenberger
55 papers receiving 3.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Plant Science 2.7k
- Molecular Biology 2.1k
- Cell Biology 308
- Genetics 214
- Food Science 175
Countries citing papers authored by Brigitte Poppenberger
This map shows the geographic impact of Brigitte Poppenberger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brigitte Poppenberger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brigitte Poppenberger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brigitte Poppenberger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brigitte Poppenberger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brigitte Poppenberger. The network helps show where Brigitte Poppenberger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brigitte Poppenberger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brigitte Poppenberger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brigitte Poppenberger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brigitte Poppenberger. Brigitte Poppenberger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 85 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 172 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 243 | |
| 15 | 47 | |
| 16 | 122 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 137 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 206 |
About Brigitte Poppenberger
Brigitte Poppenberger is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, having authored 55 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Molecular Biology Research (28 papers), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (13 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (2.7k citations), Molecular Biology (2.1k citations) and Biochemistry (153 citations). Brigitte Poppenberger has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Wilfried Rozhon, Dianna J. Bowles, Eng‐Kiat Lim, Simon Josef Unterholzner, Fabián E. Vaistij, Tobias Sieberer, Gerhard Adam, Mamoona Khan, Franz Berthiller and Rudolf Krska. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.