Dianna J. Bowles
- Molecular Biology top 0.5%
- Plant Science top 0.2%
- Biotechnology top 0.5%
- Biochemistry top 0.5%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 2%
- Co-authors
- Eng‐Kiat LimBrigitte PoppenbergerFabián E. VaistijDavid A. AshfordJoe RossMaggie SmallwoodRosamond G. JacksonMichael J. McPherson
- Topics
- Plant Gene Expression Analysis (16 papers)Plant tissue culture and regeneration (16 papers)Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Dianna J. Bowles
103 papers receiving 8.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
- Molecular Biology 6.1k
- Plant Science 5.0k
- Biotechnology 729
- Biochemistry 523
- Nutrition and Dietetics 474
Countries citing papers authored by Dianna J. Bowles
This map shows the geographic impact of Dianna J. Bowles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dianna J. Bowles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dianna J. Bowles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dianna J. Bowles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dianna J. Bowles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dianna J. Bowles. The network helps show where Dianna J. Bowles may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dianna J. Bowles
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dianna J. Bowles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dianna J. Bowles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dianna J. Bowles. Dianna J. Bowles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 98 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 114 | |
| 4 | 59 | |
| 5 | 262 | |
| 6 | 102 | |
| 7 | 206 | |
| 8 | 80 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 257 | |
| 12 | 240 | |
| 13 | 431 | |
| 14 | 46 | |
| 15 | Plant responses to environmental stress | 89 |
| 16 | Molecular plant pathology : a practical approach | 392 |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | DEFENSE-RELATED PROTEINS IN HIGHER PLANTSbreakdown → | 809 |
| 19 | 109 | |
| 20 | 44 |
About Dianna J. Bowles
Dianna J. Bowles is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Plant Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 103 papers that have together received 9.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Gene Expression Analysis (16 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (16 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (5.0k citations), Molecular Biology (6.1k citations) and Biochemistry (523 citations). Dianna J. Bowles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eng‐Kiat Lim, Brigitte Poppenberger, Fabián E. Vaistij, David A. Ashford, Joe Ross, Maggie Smallwood, Rosamond G. Jackson, Michael J. McPherson, Sarah J. Gurr and Gillian Higgins. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.