Brett A. Murphy

730 total citations
32 papers, 444 citations indexed

About

Brett A. Murphy is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Brett A. Murphy has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 444 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Clinical Psychology, 11 papers in Social Psychology and 6 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Brett A. Murphy's work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (12 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (6 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (6 papers). Brett A. Murphy is often cited by papers focused on Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (12 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (6 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (6 papers). Brett A. Murphy collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Switzerland. Brett A. Murphy's co-authors include Scott O. Lilienfeld, Edelyn Verona, Ashley L. Watts, Thomas H. Costello, Yuk Fai Cheong, Joanna M. Berg, Nicole Schulz, Jennifer L. Skeem, Shabnam Javdani and John F. Edens and has published in prestigious journals such as Clinical Psychology Review, Personality and Individual Differences and Psychological Assessment.

In The Last Decade

Brett A. Murphy

29 papers receiving 433 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Brett A. Murphy United States 11 272 139 106 85 75 32 444
Susan Howard United Kingdom 6 405 1.5× 165 1.2× 85 0.8× 100 1.2× 66 0.9× 15 550
Astrid Bock Austria 10 319 1.2× 115 0.8× 72 0.7× 64 0.8× 68 0.9× 22 422
Jessica Dere Canada 11 168 0.6× 178 1.3× 92 0.9× 99 1.2× 116 1.5× 17 442
Catherine J. Lutz United States 9 251 0.9× 182 1.3× 70 0.7× 99 1.2× 95 1.3× 12 444
B. Esther Sportel Netherlands 8 333 1.2× 103 0.7× 61 0.6× 71 0.8× 256 3.4× 16 474
Kirstin Goth Switzerland 11 409 1.5× 62 0.4× 66 0.6× 81 1.0× 41 0.5× 37 486
Zhen Hadassah Cheng United States 9 237 0.9× 102 0.7× 77 0.7× 114 1.3× 36 0.5× 17 396
Terri Roberton Australia 8 486 1.8× 267 1.9× 79 0.7× 137 1.6× 100 1.3× 10 676
Harold Chui Hong Kong 14 355 1.3× 222 1.6× 71 0.7× 55 0.6× 84 1.1× 58 549
Abigail M. Judge United States 8 142 0.5× 116 0.8× 140 1.3× 81 1.0× 26 0.3× 15 374

Countries citing papers authored by Brett A. Murphy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brett A. Murphy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brett A. Murphy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brett A. Murphy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brett A. Murphy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brett A. Murphy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brett A. Murphy. The network helps show where Brett A. Murphy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brett A. Murphy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brett A. Murphy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brett A. Murphy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brett A. Murphy. Brett A. Murphy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Murphy, Brett A. & Judith A. Hall. (2024). How a strong measurement validity review can go astray: A look at Higgins et al. (2024) and recommendations for future measurement-focused reviews. Clinical Psychology Review. 114. 102506–102506. 2 indexed citations
2.
Murphy, Brett A., et al.. (2024). Careless Responding: Why Many Findings Are Spurious or Spuriously Inflated. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 7(1). 8 indexed citations
4.
5.
Murphy, Brett A., et al.. (2022). The Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scales probably do not validly measure need frustration.. Psychological Assessment. 35(2). 127–139. 15 indexed citations
7.
Murphy, Brett A., Scott O. Lilienfeld, & Sara B. Algoe. (2022). Why We Should Reject the Restrictive Isomorphic Matching Definition of Empathy. Emotion Review. 14(3). 167–181. 13 indexed citations
8.
Verona, Edelyn, et al.. (2022). Psychopathy facets, perceived power, and forms of aggression.. Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment. 14(3). 259–273. 5 indexed citations
9.
Murphy, Brett A. & Scott O. Lilienfeld. (2021). C. S. Peirce’s Forgotten but Enduring Relevance to Psychological Science. The American Journal of Psychology. 134(3). 347–361. 1 indexed citations
10.
Costello, Thomas H., Ashley L. Watts, Brett A. Murphy, & Scott O. Lilienfeld. (2019). Extending the nomological network of sexual objectification to psychopathic and allied personality traits.. Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment. 11(4). 237–248. 6 indexed citations
11.
Lilienfeld, Scott O., Ashley L. Watts, Brett A. Murphy, et al.. (2019). Psychopathy as an Emergent Interpersonal Syndrome: Further Reflections and Future Directions. Journal of Personality Disorders. 33(5). 645–652. 2 indexed citations
12.
Murphy, Brett A.. (2019). The Griffith empathy measure needs to be revised with attention to item coding direction: A reply to Dadds (2018). Australian Psychologist. 54(3). 167–170. 3 indexed citations
13.
Murphy, Brett A. & Scott O. Lilienfeld. (2019). Are self-report cognitive empathy ratings valid proxies for cognitive empathy ability? Negligible meta-analytic relations with behavioral task performance.. Psychological Assessment. 31(8). 1062–1072. 138 indexed citations
14.
Watts, Ashley L., et al.. (2018). Psychopathy and interests: Implications of psychopathic personality traits for vocational and avocational preferences.. Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment. 9(5). 484–489. 3 indexed citations
15.
Murphy, Brett A., Thomas H. Costello, & Scott O. Lilienfeld. (2018). Is empathic contagion helpful or harmful? Overlooked heterogeneity in the Empathy Index.. Psychological Assessment. 30(12). 1703–1708. 15 indexed citations
16.
Murphy, Brett A., Thomas H. Costello, Ashley L. Watts, et al.. (2018). Strengths and Weaknesses of Two Empathy Measures: A Comparison of the Measurement Precision, Construct Validity, and Incremental Validity of Two Multidimensional Indices. Assessment. 27(2). 246–260. 52 indexed citations
17.
Murphy, Brett A., Scott O. Lilienfeld, Jennifer L. Skeem, & John F. Edens. (2016). Are fearless dominance traits superfluous in operationalizing psychopathy? Incremental validity and sex differences.. Psychological Assessment. 28(12). 1597–1607. 30 indexed citations
18.
Schulz, Nicole, Brett A. Murphy, & Edelyn Verona. (2015). Gender differences in psychopathy links to drug use.. Law and Human Behavior. 40(2). 159–168. 28 indexed citations
19.
Verona, Edelyn, Brett A. Murphy, & Shabnam Javdani. (2015). Gendered pathways: Violent childhood maltreatment, sex exchange, and drug use.. Psychology of Violence. 6(1). 124–134. 25 indexed citations
20.
Murphy, Brett A. & Dan‐Victor Giurgiutiu. (2012). Personality Dimensions in Psychopathy: Potential Explanatory Models for Primary and Secondary Traits. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026