Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

12.7k citations
256 papers · indexed · active since 1952

Impact in

Papers in

Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

230 papers receiving 12.5k citations

Peers

Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
Comparison fields: 5 of 222
  • Applied Psychology 1.4k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.8k
  • General Decision Sciences 303
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 1.1k
  • Social Psychology 2.7k
Replace Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) with:
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) United Kingdom
Methodology United States
Communication Methods and Measures United States
Practical assessment, research & evaluation United States
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior United States
Journal of social behavior and personality United States
Research in Organizational Behavior United States
European Review of Social Psychology United States
Applied and Preventive Psychology United States
Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences United States
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science relative to Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) United Kingdom Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.7×
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science.

About Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

The 256 papers published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science in the last decades have received a total of 12.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science usually cover Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (77 papers), Applied Psychology (53 papers), Statistics and Probability (60 papers), General Decision Sciences (13 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (81 papers) specifically the topics of Mental Health Research Topics (79 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (68 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (51 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (26 papers), Data Analysis with R (22 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (20 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (19 papers) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (18 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science are David C. Funder, Daniel J. Ozer, Julia M. Rohrer, Daniël Lakens, John K. Kruschke, Anne M. Scheel, Peder Mortvedt Isager, Uri Simonsohn, David B. Flora and Violet A. Brown.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026