William Chaplin
Impact in
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Papers in
-
- Psychological Testing and Assessment 1
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 1
-
- Mental Health Treatment and Access 1
- Co-authors
- Peter M. Lewinsohn (1 shared paper)Walter Mischel (1 shared paper)Russell R. Barton (1 shared paper)Forrest Scogin (1 shared paper)Joseph E. Schumacher (1 shared paper)Mildred Vera (1 shared paper)Mae Lynn Reyes‐Rodríguez (1 shared paper)Lori Wozney (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques (1 paper)Professional Psychology Research and Practice (1 paper)Journal of Abnormal Psychology (1 paper)Psychiatric Services (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSpain
In The Last Decade
William Chaplin
4 papers receiving 358 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- General Decision Sciences 30
- Applied Psychology 81
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 160
- Clinical Psychology 179
- Social Psychology 139
Countries citing papers authored by William Chaplin
This map shows the geographic impact of William Chaplin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Chaplin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Chaplin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Chaplin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Chaplin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Chaplin. The network helps show where William Chaplin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside William Chaplin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1980 | 343 | |
| 2 | 1995 | 27 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 1 |
About William Chaplin
William Chaplin is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Infectious Diseases, having authored 4 papers that have together received 382 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migraine and Headache Studies (1 paper), Psychological Testing and Assessment (1 paper), Digital Mental Health Interventions (1 paper), Mental Health Treatment and Access (1 paper) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (30 citations), Applied Psychology (81 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (160 citations), Clinical Psychology (179 citations) and Social Psychology (139 citations). William Chaplin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Peter M. Lewinsohn, Walter Mischel, Russell R. Barton, Forrest Scogin, Joseph E. Schumacher, Mildred Vera, Mae Lynn Reyes‐Rodríguez, Lori Wozney, Anna Huguet and Ian M. Kronish. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques, Professional Psychology Research and Practice, Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Psychiatric Services.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.