Journal of Personality Disorders

1.8k papers and 64.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Journal of Personality Disorders in the last decades have received a total of 64.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Personality Disorders usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.7k papers), Philosophy (445 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (319 papers) specifically the topics of Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (1.5k papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (668 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (445 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Personality Disorders are Thomas A. Widiger, Mary C. Zanarini, Paul T. Costa, Robert R. McCrae, Joel Paris, John G. Gunderson, Frances R. Frankenburg, Peter Fonagy, Paul E. Meehl and Roel Verheul.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Personality Disorders

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Personality Disorders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Personality Disorders.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Personality Disorders

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Personality Disorders. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Personality Disorders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Personality Disorders more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025