Bregje Holleman

885 total citations
40 papers, 580 citations indexed

About

Bregje Holleman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Bregje Holleman has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 580 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 7 papers in Communication and 5 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Bregje Holleman's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (13 papers), Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (8 papers) and Social Media and Politics (7 papers). Bregje Holleman is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (13 papers), Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (8 papers) and Social Media and Politics (7 papers). Bregje Holleman collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Russia and United States. Bregje Holleman's co-authors include Naomi Kamoen, Jaap M. J. Murre, Jos J. A. Van Berkum, Mante S. Nieuwland, Marte Otten, Claes H. de Vreese, André Krouwel, Huub van den Bergh, Ted Sanders and Antonio G. Chessa and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Psychological Science.

In The Last Decade

Bregje Holleman

36 papers receiving 546 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Bregje Holleman Netherlands 14 200 154 105 88 83 40 580
Stephen Reder United States 14 118 0.6× 133 0.9× 86 0.8× 76 0.9× 39 0.5× 52 682
Samuel D. Bradley United States 15 279 1.4× 104 0.7× 137 1.3× 99 1.1× 15 0.2× 33 740
Linor L. Hadar Israel 17 119 0.6× 33 0.2× 121 1.2× 56 0.6× 36 0.4× 39 1.1k
Nia Dowell United States 16 99 0.5× 46 0.3× 82 0.8× 45 0.5× 18 0.2× 32 784
Aileen Oeberst Germany 13 191 1.0× 142 0.9× 153 1.5× 49 0.6× 13 0.2× 49 562
Leon Rozenblit United States 7 173 0.9× 172 1.1× 95 0.9× 101 1.1× 11 0.1× 12 798
Mindy L. Kornhaber United States 11 96 0.5× 29 0.2× 156 1.5× 82 0.9× 35 0.4× 22 943
Matthew Fisher United States 11 182 0.9× 138 0.9× 68 0.6× 66 0.8× 15 0.2× 18 521
Ilkka Arminen Finland 17 182 0.9× 21 0.1× 116 1.1× 188 2.1× 19 0.2× 53 859
Robert A. Bartsch United States 13 88 0.4× 30 0.2× 85 0.8× 175 2.0× 40 0.5× 23 659

Countries citing papers authored by Bregje Holleman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bregje Holleman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bregje Holleman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bregje Holleman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bregje Holleman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bregje Holleman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bregje Holleman. The network helps show where Bregje Holleman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bregje Holleman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bregje Holleman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bregje Holleman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bregje Holleman. Bregje Holleman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Holleman, Bregje, et al.. (2024). Relevant dimensions to give meaning to pension decisions. Work Aging and Retirement. 11(2). 127–138.
2.
Lentz, Leo, W. Marty Blom, Anouska Michelsen‐Huisman, et al.. (2022). Precautionary allergen labeling: Current communication problems and potential for future improvements. Food Control. 147. 109561–109561. 11 indexed citations
3.
Maat, Henk Pander, Ben Staal, & Bregje Holleman. (2021). The Framing Preference for Large and Increasing Components in Static and Dynamic Descriptions. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 720427–720427.
4.
Holleman, Bregje, et al.. (2021). Designing pension communication. Information Design Journal. 26(3). 260–281. 1 indexed citations
5.
Kamoen, Naomi, et al.. (2019). Issue framing in online voting advice applications: The effect of left-wing and right-wing headers on reported attitudes. PLoS ONE. 14(2). e0212555–e0212555. 13 indexed citations
6.
Kamoen, Naomi, et al.. (2018). Same but different: A typology of Voting Advice Application users in first- and second-order elections. Acta Politica. 54(2). 225–244. 10 indexed citations
7.
Kamoen, Naomi, et al.. (2016). Inwisselbaar of niet?. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 38(1). 27–55. 2 indexed citations
8.
Holleman, Bregje, et al.. (2016). Positive vs. Negative: The Impact of Question Polarity in Voting Advice Applications. PLoS ONE. 11(10). e0164184–e0164184. 25 indexed citations
9.
Holleman, Bregje, et al.. (2016). Positive vs. Negative : How question polarity in Voting Advice Applications affects the answers and the voting advice. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1 indexed citations
10.
Holleman, Bregje, et al.. (2014). Positive versus Negative wordings : a threat to the validity of VAAs. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).
11.
Holleman, Bregje, et al.. (2014). Beyond Young, Highly Educated Males: A Typology of VAA Users. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 11(4). 397–411. 36 indexed citations
12.
Kamoen, Naomi, Bregje Holleman, Huub van den Bergh, & Ted Sanders. (2011). Positive, negative, and bipolar questions: The effect of question polarity on ratings of text readability. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 21 indexed citations
13.
Berkum, Jos J. A. Van, Bregje Holleman, Mante S. Nieuwland, Marte Otten, & Jaap M. J. Murre. (2009). Right or Wrong?. Psychological Science. 20(9). 1092–1099. 168 indexed citations
14.
Holleman, Bregje, et al.. (2008). The pragmatics of profiling: Framing effects in text interpretation and text production. Journal of Pragmatics. 41(11). 2204–2221. 23 indexed citations
15.
Kamoen, Naomi, Bregje Holleman, & Huub van den Bergh. (2007). Hoe makkelijk is een niet moeilijke tekst?: Een meta-analyse naar het effect van vraagformulering in tekstevaluatieonderzoek. 29(4). 314–332. 2 indexed citations
16.
Kamoen, Naomi, Bregje Holleman, & Huub van den Bergh. (2007). Hoe gemakkelijk is een niet moeilijke tekst? Een meta-analyse naar het effect van vraagformulering bij het meten van tekstwaardering. [How easy is a not difficult text? A meta-analysis into the effects of question wording when measuring text evaluation].. 29(4). 314. 2 indexed citations
17.
Holleman, Bregje & Jaap M. J. Murre. (2007). Getting from neuron to checkmark: models and methods in cognitive survey research. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 22(5). 709–732. 2 indexed citations
18.
Berkum, Jos J. A. Van, Bregje Holleman, Jaap M. J. Murre, & Mante S. Nieuwland. (2006). Studying question answering with brain potentials. Max Planck Digital Library. 1 indexed citations
19.
Holleman, Bregje. (2005). The Meanings of ‘Yes’ and ‘No’. An Explanation for the Forbid/Allow Asymmetry. Quality & Quantity. 40(1). 1–38. 19 indexed citations
20.
Holleman, Bregje. (1999). Wording Effects in Survey Research Using Meta-Analysis to Explain the Forbid/Allow Asymmetry. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics. 6(1). 29–40. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stephen Reder Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Samuel D. Bradley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Linor L. Hadar Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nia Dowell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Aileen Oeberst Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Leon Rozenblit Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mindy L. Kornhaber Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Matthew Fisher Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ilkka Arminen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert A. Bartsch
Rankless by CCL
2026