Brad Astbury
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Co-authors
- Frans L. LeeuwGill WesthorpWendy W. ChapmanTimothy FazioLouise ShawMeredith J. LaytonKayley LyonsDimitri Renmans
- Topics
- Evaluation and Performance Assessment (3 papers)Public Policy and Administration Research (2 papers)Educational Assessment and Improvement (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaNetherlandsMorocco
In The Last Decade
Brad Astbury
8 papers receiving 584 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- General Health Professions 272
- Management Science and Operations Research 170
- Sociology and Political Science 119
- Economics and Econometrics 77
- Education 65
Countries citing papers authored by Brad Astbury
This map shows the geographic impact of Brad Astbury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brad Astbury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brad Astbury more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brad Astbury
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brad Astbury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brad Astbury. The network helps show where Brad Astbury may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brad Astbury
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brad Astbury. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brad Astbury based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brad Astbury. Brad Astbury is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Unpacking Black Boxes: Mechanisms and Theory Building in Evaluationbreakdown → | 572 |
| 8 | Evaluation of Transition: A Positive Start to School Pilots | 5 |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | Living On Edge: Understanding the Social Context of Knife Carriage Among Young People | 1 |
About Brad Astbury
Brad Astbury is a scholar working on General Psychology, Medical Laboratory Technology and Public Administration, having authored 10 papers that have together received 623 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evaluation and Performance Assessment (3 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (2 papers) and Educational Assessment and Improvement (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (170 citations), Public Administration (43 citations) and General Health Professions (272 citations). Brad Astbury has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Netherlands and Morocco. Frequent co-authors include Frans L. Leeuw, Gill Westhorp, Wendy W. Chapman, Timothy Fazio, Louise Shaw, Meredith J. Layton, Kayley Lyons, Dimitri Renmans, Zakaria Belrhiti and Daniel Capurro. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Health Services Research, American Journal of Evaluation and Evaluation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.