Rebecca Hardwick
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Epidemiology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Rob AndersonJanet C. LongEmilie Francis‐AutonJeffrey BraithwaiteMitchell SarkiesChris CooperChiara PomareRichard Byng
- Topics
- Health Policy Implementation Science (10 papers)Primary Care and Health Outcomes (8 papers)Evaluation and Performance Assessment (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAustralasian Journal of ParamedicineBMC Medical Research Methodology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaQatar
In The Last Decade
Rebecca Hardwick
19 papers receiving 193 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- General Health Professions 127
- Economics and Econometrics 46
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 24
- Epidemiology 19
- Sociology and Political Science 16
Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca Hardwick
This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca Hardwick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca Hardwick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca Hardwick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca Hardwick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca Hardwick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca Hardwick. The network helps show where Rebecca Hardwick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca Hardwick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca Hardwick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca Hardwick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca Hardwick. Rebecca Hardwick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | Exploring reasons for variation in ordering thyroid function tests in primary care: a qualitative study. | 4 |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Rebecca Hardwick
Rebecca Hardwick is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health Information Management and Family Practice, having authored 20 papers that have together received 194 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (10 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (8 papers) and Evaluation and Performance Assessment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (127 citations), Health Information Management (12 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (9 citations). Rebecca Hardwick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Rob Anderson, Janet C. Long, Emilie Francis‐Auton, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Mitchell Sarkies, Chris Cooper, Chiara Pomare, Richard Byng, Mark Pearson and Catherine Haighton. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Australasian Journal of Paramedicine and BMC Medical Research Methodology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.