BMC Health Services Research

14.6k papers and 281.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 14.6k papers published in BMC Health Services Research in the last decades have received a total of 281.4k indexed citations. Papers published in BMC Health Services Research usually cover General Health Professions (7.4k papers), Economics and Econometrics (3.3k papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (2.3k papers) specifically the topics of Global Maternal and Child Health (1.8k papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (1.7k papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1.6k papers). The most active scholars publishing in BMC Health Services Research are Jill Francis, Martin Cartwright, Mandeep Sekhon, Mike Slade, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Albert Boonstra, Carl May, Carolyn Chew‐Graham, Sudeh Cheraghi‐Sohi and Peter Groenewegen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in BMC Health Services Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in BMC Health Services Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in BMC Health Services Research.

Countries where authors publish in BMC Health Services Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in BMC Health Services Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in BMC Health Services Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BMC Health Services Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025