Bonner Mitchell

687 citations
40 papers · 176 indexed · h-index 8

Bonner Mitchell

27 papers receiving 110 citations

Peers

Bonner Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • History 78
  • Museology 22
  • Classics 22
  • General Arts and Humanities 5
  • Music 13
Replace Charles L. Stinger with:
Charles L. Stinger
Steven Mullaney India
James A. Parr United States
R. F. Brissenden
Margaret L. King United States
Frederick A. de Armas United States
Francesco Petrarca Canada
Natasha Korda United States
Patricia Simons United States
Richard Strier United States
Bonner Mitchell relative to Charles L. Stinger Charles L. Stinger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Charles L. Stinger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bonner Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bonner Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bonner Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bonner Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bonner Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bonner Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bonner Mitchell. The network helps show where Bonner Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Bonner Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bonner Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Bonner Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20032
2 19983
3
Charles V as triumphator
19981
4 19921
5 199011
6 19883
7 19872
8
The majesty of the State : triumphal progresses of foreign sovereigns in Reinassance Italy (1494-1600)
19861
9 198610
10 19841
11 19832
12 19823
13 19821
14
Research in seismology. Semi-annual technical report no. 1, 1 October 1978--31 March 1979. [Dept. of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Saint Louis Univ. , St. Louis, MO]
19793
15 19782
16 19779
17 19751
18 19751
19 19733
20
A Renaissance entertainment : festivities for the marriage of Cosimo I, Duke of Florence, in 1539 : an edition of the music, poetry, comedy, and descriptive account, with commentary
19682

About Bonner Mitchell

Bonner Mitchell is a scholar working on Classics, History and General Arts and Humanities, having authored 40 papers that have together received 176 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (11 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (6 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (4 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (3 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (3 papers), Historical Art and Architecture Studies (3 papers), French Literature and Criticism (2 papers) and Historical and Literary Analyses (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (78 citations), Museology (22 citations) and Classics (22 citations). Bonner Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Roy C. Strong, Giovanni Cipriani, Paul Ricœur, Richard C. Trexler, Hazel E. Barnes, Otto W. Nuttli, Jane Gallop, Clarke Garrett, Bettina L. Knapp and David Orr. Their work appears in journals such as Sixteenth Century Journal, The American Historical Review, World Literature Today, The Classical World and Russian History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026