Janet Grassia

793 total citations
7 papers, 560 citations indexed

About

Janet Grassia is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Artificial Intelligence and General Decision Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, Janet Grassia has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 560 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 2 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 2 papers in General Decision Sciences. Recurrent topics in Janet Grassia's work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (1 paper) and Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (1 paper). Janet Grassia is often cited by papers focused on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (1 paper) and Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (1 paper). Janet Grassia collaborates with scholars based in United States. Janet Grassia's co-authors include Tamra Pearson d’Estrée, Kenneth R. Hammond, Robert M. Hamm, W. R. Moninger, Thomas R. Stewart, Lyn Kathlene and Ronald D. Brunner and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Weather and Forecasting and Policy Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Janet Grassia

7 papers receiving 500 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Janet Grassia United States	6	195	138	120	82	81	7	560
Tamra Pearson d’Estrée United States	7	173 0.9×	122 0.9×	112 0.9×	78 1.0×	67 0.8×	13	573
Masanao Toda Japan	9	134 0.7×	97 0.7×	109 0.9×	51 0.6×	86 1.1×	26	467
Jeff T. Casey United States	9	132 0.7×	66 0.5×	69 0.6×	18 0.2×	33 0.4×	14	350
Susan C. Streufert United States	10	43 0.2×	100 0.7×	181 1.5×	39 0.5×	47 0.6×	27	569
Tomás Lejarraga Germany	15	379 1.9×	133 1.0×	60 0.5×	135 1.6×	101 1.2×	27	706
Rebecca M. Pliske United States	9	53 0.3×	62 0.4×	109 0.9×	62 0.8×	57 0.7×	16	339
Ana M. Franco‐Watkins United States	12	133 0.7×	30 0.2×	89 0.7×	110 1.3×	55 0.7×	25	482
Rickey P. Thomas United States	6	63 0.3×	87 0.6×	77 0.6×	26 0.3×	89 1.1×	13	373
M. Hammerton United Kingdom	11	203 1.0×	47 0.3×	69 0.6×	165 2.0×	75 0.9×	36	859
Christoph Ungemach United States	6	180 0.9×	61 0.4×	44 0.4×	67 0.8×	41 0.5×	10	500

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Grassia

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Grassia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Grassia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Grassia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Grassia

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Grassia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Grassia. The network helps show where Janet Grassia may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Grassia

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Grassia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Grassia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Grassia. Janet Grassia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Stewart, Thomas R., et al.. (1989). Analysis of Expert Judgment in a Hail Forecasting Experiment. Weather and Forecasting. 4(1). 24–34. 26 indexed citations

2.

Grassia, Janet, et al.. (1987). Direct comparison of the relative efficiency on intuitive and analytical cognition. 17(5). 753–770. 72 indexed citations

3.

Hammond, Kenneth R., Robert M. Hamm, Janet Grassia, & Tamra Pearson d’Estrée. (1987). Direct comparison of the efficacy of intuitive and analytical cognition in expert judgment. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics. 17(5). 753–770. 402 indexed citations

4.

Brunner, Ronald D., et al.. (1987). Improving data utilization: the case-wise alternative. Policy Sciences. 20(4). 365–394. 6 indexed citations

5.

Hammond, Kenneth R., Robert M. Hamm, & Janet Grassia. (1986). Generalizing over conditions by combining the multitrait-multimethod matrix and the representative design of experiments.. Psychological Bulletin. 100(2). 257–269. 43 indexed citations

6.

Hammond, Kenneth R., Robert M. Hamm, & Janet Grassia. (1986). Generalizing over conditions by combining the multitrait-multimethod matrix and the representative design of experiments.. Psychological Bulletin. 100(2). 257–269. 4 indexed citations

7.

Hammond, Kenneth R., Robert M. Hamm, Janet Grassia, & Tamra Pearson d’Estrée. (1983). Direct Comparison of Intuitive, Quasi-Rational and Analytical Cognition. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact