553 total citations 6 papers, 110 citations indexed
About
Bill Winn is a scholar working on Information Systems, Literature and Literary Theory and Education.
According to data from OpenAlex, Bill Winn has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 110 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Information Systems, 1 paper in Literature and Literary Theory and 1 paper in Education. Recurrent topics in Bill Winn's work include Literacy, Media, and Education (1 paper), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (1 paper) and Gender and Technology in Education (1 paper). Bill Winn is often cited by papers focused on Literacy, Media, and Education (1 paper), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (1 paper) and Gender and Technology in Education (1 paper). Bill Winn collaborates with scholars based in . Bill Winn's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Educational Media International, Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology and Journal of educational thought..
This map shows the geographic impact of Bill Winn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bill Winn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bill Winn more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bill Winn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bill Winn. The network helps show where Bill Winn may publish in the future.
1981·Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology·Bill Winn
0
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.