Neil Thomason

1.1k total citations
22 papers, 742 citations indexed

About

Neil Thomason is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Neil Thomason has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 742 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 6 papers in Clinical Psychology and 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Neil Thomason's work include Gambling Behavior and Treatments (6 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (5 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers). Neil Thomason is often cited by papers focused on Gambling Behavior and Treatments (6 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (5 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers). Neil Thomason collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Neil Thomason's co-authors include Geoff Cumming, Fiona Fidler, Sue Finch, Alun C. Jackson, Shane Thomas, Beth R. Crisp, Mark A. Burgman, Barbara Murphy, Michael Le Grande and Branden Fitelson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Psychological Science and Conservation Biology.

In The Last Decade

Neil Thomason

22 papers receiving 667 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Neil Thomason Australia	12	228	170	138	70	69	22	742
Hripsime A. Kalaian United States	8	102 0.4×	109 0.6×	52 0.4×	43 0.6×	55 0.8×	8	565
Mariëlle Zondervan‐Zwijnenburg Netherlands	13	177 0.8×	48 0.3×	161 1.2×	109 1.6×	36 0.5×	23	796
Clifford E. Lunneborg United States	18	76 0.3×	48 0.3×	218 1.6×	75 1.1×	33 0.5×	71	1.2k
Klaus D. Kubinger Austria	14	100 0.4×	25 0.1×	97 0.7×	199 2.8×	39 0.6×	63	797
W. L. Rosenbaum Canada	7	32 0.1×	217 1.3×	60 0.4×	15 0.2×	71 1.0×	10	568
Mallory C. Kidwell United States	8	52 0.2×	358 2.1×	25 0.2×	70 1.0×	72 1.0×	10	859
Jeroen Pannekoek Netherlands	10	44 0.2×	18 0.1×	203 1.5×	87 1.2×	28 0.4×	25	772
Gary Teng United States	9	250 1.1×	13 0.1×	55 0.4×	93 1.3×	55 0.8×	13	1.0k
Nancy L. Peterson United States	15	174 0.8×	16 0.1×	45 0.3×	27 0.4×	63 0.9×	21	710
S. H. C. du Toit United States	11	31 0.1×	23 0.1×	133 1.0×	91 1.3×	12 0.2×	13	545

Countries citing papers authored by Neil Thomason

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Thomason's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Thomason with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Thomason more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Thomason

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Thomason. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Thomason. The network helps show where Neil Thomason may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil Thomason

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil Thomason. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil Thomason based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neil Thomason. Neil Thomason is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Grande, Michael Le, Alun C. Jackson, Barbara Murphy, & Neil Thomason. (2015). Relationship between sleep disturbance, depression and anxiety in the 12 months following a cardiac event. Psychology Health & Medicine. 21(1). 52–59. 26 indexed citations

Fitelson, Branden & Neil Thomason. (2008). Bayesians sometimes cannot ignore even very implausible theories (even ones that have not yet been thought of). 6. 8 indexed citations

Fidler, Fiona, et al.. (2006). Impact of Criticism of Null‐Hypothesis Significance Testing on Statistical Reporting Practices in Conservation Biology. Conservation Biology. 20(5). 1539–1544. 109 indexed citations

Fidler, Fiona, et al.. (2005). Toward Improved Statistical Reporting in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 73(1). 136–143. 51 indexed citations

Jackson, Alun C., et al.. (2005). Change and continuity in a help-seeking problem gambling population: A five-year record<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn3">*</xref>. Journal of Gambling Issues. 22 indexed citations

Crisp, Beth R., et al.. (2004). Not the Same: A Comparison of Female and Male Clients Seeking Treatment from Problem Gambling Counselling Services. Journal of Gambling Studies. 20(3). 283–299. 85 indexed citations

Fidler, Fiona, et al.. (2004). Statistical reform in medicine, psychology and ecology. The Journal of Socio-Economics. 33(5). 615–630. 70 indexed citations

Fidler, Fiona, et al.. (2004). Editors Can Lead Researchers to Confidence Intervals, but Can't Make Them Think. Psychological Science. 15(2). 119–126. 152 indexed citations

Finch, Sue, Neil Thomason, & Geoff Cumming. (2002). Past and Future American Psychological Association Guidelines for Statistical Practice. Theory & Psychology. 12(6). 825–853. 26 indexed citations

10.

Crisp, Beth R., Shane Thomas, Alun C. Jackson, & Neil Thomason. (2001). The Influence of Demographic, Behavioural and Treatment Characteristics on Problem Gambling Counselling Outcomes. Australian Journal of Primary Health. 7(2). 32–36. 7 indexed citations

11.

Crisp, Beth R., et al.. (2001). Is more better? The relationship between outcomes achieved by problem gamblers and the number of counselling sessions attended. Australian Social Work. 54(3). 83–92. 12 indexed citations

12.

Finch, Sue, Geoff Cumming, & Neil Thomason. (2001). Colloquium on Effect Sizes: the Roles of Editors, Textbook Authors, and the Publication Manual. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 61(2). 181–210. 45 indexed citations

13.

Crisp, Beth R., et al.. (2000). Sex Differences in the Treatment Needs and Outcomes of Problem Gamblers. Research on Social Work Practice. 10(2). 229–242. 64 indexed citations

14.

Thomason, Neil. (1995). Philosophy Discussions With Less B.S.. Teaching Philosophy. 18(1). 15–30. 2 indexed citations

15.

Thomason, Neil, et al.. (1994). Understanding central concepts of statistics and experimental design in the social sciences. 59. 59–81. 9 indexed citations

16.

Thomason, Neil. (1994). The Power of ARCHED Hypotheses: Feyerabend's Galileo as a Closet Rationalist. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 45(1). 255–264. 3 indexed citations

17.

Thomason, Neil. (1993). Science and Relativism: Some Key Controversies in the Philosophy of Science. Philosophical Books. 34(4). 249–253. 4 indexed citations

18.

Thomason, Neil. (1992). SOME PROBLEMS WITH CHISHOLM AND POTTER'S SOLUTION TO THE PARADOX OF ANALYSIS. Metaphilosophy. 23(1-2). 132–138. 2 indexed citations

19.

Thomason, Neil. (1992). Could Lakatos, Even With Zahar's Criterion for Novel Fact, Evaluate the Copernican Research Programme?. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 43(2). 161–200. 7 indexed citations

20.

Thomason, Neil. (1990). Making Student Groups Work. Teaching Philosophy. 13(2). 111–125. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact