Neil Thomason
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 1%
- Statistics and Probability top 2%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Geoff CummingFiona FidlerSue FinchAlun C. JacksonShane ThomasBeth R. CrispMark A. BurgmanBarbara Murphy
- Topics
- Gambling Behavior and Treatments (6 papers)Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (5 papers)Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Neil Thomason
22 papers receiving 667 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Clinical Psychology 228
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 170
- Statistics and Probability 138
- Management Science and Operations Research 70
- General Health Professions 69
Countries citing papers authored by Neil Thomason
This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Thomason's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Thomason with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Thomason more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Thomason
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Thomason. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Thomason. The network helps show where Neil Thomason may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil Thomason
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil Thomason. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil Thomason based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neil Thomason. Neil Thomason is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 109 | |
| 4 | 51 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 85 | |
| 7 | 70 | |
| 8 | 152 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 45 | |
| 13 | 64 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | Understanding central concepts of statistics and experimental design in the social sciences | 9 |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Neil Thomason
Neil Thomason is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Statistics and Probability, having authored 22 papers that have together received 742 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gambling Behavior and Treatments (6 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (5 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (170 citations), Statistics and Probability (138 citations) and Clinical Psychology (228 citations). Neil Thomason has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Geoff Cumming, Fiona Fidler, Sue Finch, Alun C. Jackson, Shane Thomas, Beth R. Crisp, Mark A. Burgman, Barbara Murphy, Michael Le Grande and Branden Fitelson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Psychological Science and Conservation Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.