Beth Fields

701 citations
70 papers · 413 indexed · h-index 13

Beth Fields

56 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers

Beth Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 35
  • General Health Professions 189
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 32
  • Occupational Therapy 24
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 85
Replace Leah Macaden with:
Leah Macaden United Kingdom
Anouk Spijker Netherlands
Vítor Parola Portugal
Sheryl Zimmerman United States
Darlene McKenzie United States
Bradley R. Fulton United States
Jo‐Anne Rayner Australia
Christina Juthberg Sweden
Janet Brandling United Kingdom
D. Patricia Gray United States
Beth Fields relative to Leah Macaden United Kingdom Leah Macaden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Leah Macaden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beth Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Fields. The network helps show where Beth Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beth Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beth Fields Line = papers co-authored together Beth Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20252
2 20250
3 20250
4 20250
5 20250
6 20244
7 20240
8 20240
9 20240
10 20240
11 20240
12 20231
13 20231
14 20231
15 20231
16 20232
17 20221
18 20225
19 20204
20 201914

About Beth Fields

Beth Fields is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Occupational Therapy, General Health Professions, Rehabilitation and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (23 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (11 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (10 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (8 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (7 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (7 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (6 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (35 citations), General Health Professions (189 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (32 citations), Occupational Therapy (24 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (85 citations). Beth Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Wendy Wood, Juleen Rodakowski, A. Everette James, Daniel Liebzeit, Scott R. Beach, Nicole E. Werner, Alicia I. Arbaje, Stacy Smallfield, J.E. Bruemmer and Merinda McLure. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Occupational Therapy, The Gerontologist, Innovation in Aging, Disability and Rehabilitation and Quality in Ageing and Older Adults.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026