Anouk Spijker
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Emergency Medicine top 5%
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Myrra Vernooij‐DassenHub WollersheimEmmelyne VasseLisette SchoonhovenPaul BarachCor J. KalkmanGijs HesselinkJanine Liefers
- Topics
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers)Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAnnals of Internal MedicineJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomBelgium
In The Last Decade
Anouk Spijker
7 papers receiving 524 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- General Health Professions 319
- Psychiatry and Mental health 205
- Emergency Medicine 104
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 87
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 86
Countries citing papers authored by Anouk Spijker
This map shows the geographic impact of Anouk Spijker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anouk Spijker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anouk Spijker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anouk Spijker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anouk Spijker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anouk Spijker. The network helps show where Anouk Spijker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anouk Spijker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anouk Spijker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anouk Spijker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anouk Spijker. Anouk Spijker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 250 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 103 | |
| 8 | 148 |
About Anouk Spijker
Anouk Spijker is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 551 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (87 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (205 citations) and General Health Professions (319 citations). Anouk Spijker has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Myrra Vernooij‐Dassen, Hub Wollersheim, Emmelyne Vasse, Lisette Schoonhoven, Paul Barach, Cor J. Kalkman, Gijs Hesselink, Janine Liefers, Frans R.J. Verhey and Eddy Adang. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Annals of Internal Medicine and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.