Benjamin W. Labaree

23 papers receiving 114 citations

Peers

Benjamin W. Labaree
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Anthropology 42
  • Space and Planetary Science 4
  • Archeology 30
  • Conservation 7
  • Archeology 2
Replace Albert Boime with:
Albert Boime United States
Robert Blair St. George United States
Brian W. Blouet United States
Barry M. Gough Canada
George Miles United States
Paul E. Hoffman United States
Oscar Osburn Winther United States
C. J. Bishko United States
Oliver Impey United Kingdom
Daniel B. Shea United States
Benjamin W. Labaree relative to Albert Boime United States Albert Boime's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Albert Boime · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin W. Labaree

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin W. Labaree's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin W. Labaree with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin W. Labaree more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin W. Labaree

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin W. Labaree. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin W. Labaree. The network helps show where Benjamin W. Labaree may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin W. Labaree, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin W. Labaree Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin W. Labaree links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Boston Tea Party
196419
2 199119
3 199018
4 195714
5 196313
6 19938
7 20007
8 19567
9 19667
10 19856
11
New England and the Sea
19705
12 19885
13 19745
14 19624
15 19764
16 19714
17 19633
18 19773
19 19812
20 19612

About Benjamin W. Labaree

Benjamin W. Labaree is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Marketing, Anthropology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 165 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (14 papers), American History and Culture (9 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (6 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (4 papers), Race, History, and American Society (3 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper), Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (1 paper) and Ancient Near East History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (42 citations), Space and Planetary Science (4 citations), Archeology (30 citations), Conservation (7 citations) and Archeology (2 citations). Benjamin W. Labaree has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include George F. Bass, Staughton Lynd, R. D. Finch, John Elder, Jack M. Sosin, N. A. M. Rodger, Ted Steinberg, Bradford Perkins, Peter D. G. Thomas and James Hutson. Their work appears in journals such as The New England Quarterly, The William and Mary Quarterly, Journal of American History, The American Historical Review and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact