Ben Golder
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Law top 2%
- History top 2%
- Topics
- Law in Society and Culture (10 papers)Foucault, Power, and Ethics (9 papers)Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (9 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and PracticeContemporary Political TheoryModern Law Review
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomIreland
In The Last Decade
Ben Golder
30 papers receiving 567 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Sociology and Political Science 431
- Political Science and International Relations 201
- Gender Studies 86
- Law 78
- History 68
Countries citing papers authored by Ben Golder
This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Golder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Golder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Golder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Golder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Golder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Golder. The network helps show where Ben Golder may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ben Golder
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ben Golder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ben Golder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ben Golder. Ben Golder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | From the Crisis of Critique to the Critique of Crisis | 1 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | On the Stakes of Legal Performativity | 1 |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | Foucault and the Genealogy of Pastoral Power | 31 |
| 15 | 312 | |
| 16 | What Is 'Terrorism'?: Problems of Legal Definition | 22 |
| 17 | Rethinking the Subject of Postmodern Feminist Legal Theory: Towards a Feminist Foucaultian Jurisprudence | 1 |
| 18 | Law, History, Colonialism: An Orientalist Reading of Australian Native Title Law | 2 |
| 19 | From McFarlane to Melchior and Beyond: Love, Sex, Money and Commodification in the Anglo-Australian Law of Torts | 1 |
| 20 | The Homosexual Advance Defence and the Law/Body Nexus: Towards a Poetics of Law Reform | 6 |
About Ben Golder
Ben Golder is a scholar working on Law, History and Gender Studies, having authored 33 papers that have together received 664 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Law in Society and Culture (10 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (9 papers) and Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (431 citations), Gender Studies (86 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (201 citations). Ben Golder has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Peter Fitzpatrick, George Williams and Tanja Aalberts. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice, Contemporary Political Theory and Modern Law Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.