Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Postharvest losses and waste in developed and less developed countries: opportunities to improve resource use
2010513 citationsR.J. Hodges, Jean C. Buzby et al.The Journal of Agricultural Scienceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Bennett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Bennett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Bennett more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Bennett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Bennett. The network helps show where Ben Bennett may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ben Bennett
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ben Bennett.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ben Bennett based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ben Bennett. Ben Bennett is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bennett, Ben & Karl M. Rich. (2020). Can trade preferences stimulate sectoral development? The case of Namibian and Botswanan beef exports to Norway. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research).1 indexed citations
Naziri, Diego, et al.. (2014). The diversity of postharvest losses in cassava value chains in selected developing countries. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 115(2). 111–123.37 indexed citations
Hodges, R.J., Jean C. Buzby, & Ben Bennett. (2010). Postharvest losses and waste in developed and less developed countries: opportunities to improve resource use. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 149(S1). 37–45.513 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Bennett, Ben, et al.. (2007). Making the Most of Natural Advantages: Intellectual Property and Natural Products in Botswana.1 indexed citations
15.
Bennett, Ben. (2006). Natural Products: The New Engine for African Trade Growth Consultancy to Further Develop the Trade Component of the Natural Resources Enterprise Programme (NATPRO) By.3 indexed citations
Cunningham, Ian, Graham Dawes, & Ben Bennett. (2004). The handbook of work based learning : Ian Cunningham, Graham Dawes, and Ben Bennett. Gower eBooks.1 indexed citations
18.
Bennett, Ben. (2003). Job rotation: its role in promoting learning in organizations.13 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.