Carl Elliott
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Philosophy top 1%
- Co-authors
- Peter KrämerTrudo LemmensBarton MoffattRoberto AbadieRobert CrouchJosephine JohnstonGrant GillettJing-Bao Nie
- Topics
- Ethics in medical practice (20 papers)Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (12 papers)Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNew ZealandCanada
In The Last Decade
Carl Elliott
75 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 531
- General Health Professions 381
- Clinical Psychology 338
- Cognitive Neuroscience 248
- Philosophy 235
Countries citing papers authored by Carl Elliott
This map shows the geographic impact of Carl Elliott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carl Elliott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carl Elliott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Carl Elliott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carl Elliott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carl Elliott. The network helps show where Carl Elliott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carl Elliott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carl Elliott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carl Elliott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carl Elliott. Carl Elliott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | Why Research Oversight Bodies Should Interview Research Subjects. | 2 |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | Involuntarily Committed Patients as Prisoners | 1 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | Guinea-pigging: healthy human subjects for drug safety trials are in demand. But is it a living? | 31 |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | Inappropriate requests from patients : main topic | 0 |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 49 | |
| 16 | Pursued by Happiness and Beaten Senseless | 19 |
| 17 | Travelers, Mercenaries, and Psychopaths | 4 |
| 18 | 93 | |
| 19 | Down with Placebolatry | 1 |
| 20 | Puppetmasters and Personality Disorders: Wittgenstein, Mechanism, and Moral Responsibility | 2 |
About Carl Elliott
Carl Elliott is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Pharmacology and Philosophy, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (20 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (12 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (189 citations), Philosophy (235 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (531 citations). Carl Elliott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Peter Krämer, Trudo Lemmens, Barton Moffatt, Roberto Abadie, Robert Crouch, Josephine Johnston, Grant Gillett, Jing-Bao Nie, Ezekiel J. Emanuel and Charles Weijer. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet and JAMA.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.