This map shows the geographic impact of B. R. Sthapit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. R. Sthapit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. R. Sthapit more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. R. Sthapit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. R. Sthapit. The network helps show where B. R. Sthapit may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. R. Sthapit
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. R. Sthapit.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. R. Sthapit based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with B. R. Sthapit. B. R. Sthapit is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mal, Bhag, et al.. (2011). Conservation and sustainable use of tropical fruit species diversity: Bioversity's efforts in Asia, the Pacific and Oceania. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research). 24(1). 1–22.6 indexed citations
6.
Sthapit, B. R., et al.. (2006). On-farm management of agricultural diversity in Nepal..11 indexed citations
Sthapit, B. R., et al.. (2005). Role of home gardens in on-farm agrobiodiversity management and enhancing livelihoods of rural farmers of Nepal.. 112–122.4 indexed citations
9.
Joshi, Brijendra Kumar, et al.. (2005). Intra- and interpopulation variation in finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn) landraces grown in Kachorwa, Bara, Nepal.. 84–95.1 indexed citations
10.
Tuyển, Trương Văn, et al.. (2005). In situ conservation of native cardamom diversity in natural ecosystems of Vietnam: lessons learned and policy issues.. 49–58.2 indexed citations
11.
Joshi, Brijendra Kumar, et al.. (2005). Locating diversity of broad leaf mustard (Brassica juncea L.) in Nepal.. 161–166.1 indexed citations
12.
Sthapit, B. R., et al.. (2004). Contribution of home gardens to livelihoods of Nepalese farmers.. 18–26.2 indexed citations
13.
Aryal, Kamal, et al.. (2004). Home gardens: an opportunity to minimize pressure on slash and burn system and option for improving dietary diversity of Chepang households.. 35–47.4 indexed citations
14.
Sthapit, B. R., et al.. (2003). On-farm management of agricultural biodiversity in Vietnam. Proceedings of a symposium, Hanoi, Vietnam, 6-12 December, 2001..3 indexed citations
15.
Chaudhary, Pashupati, R. B. Rana, Deepak Rijal, et al.. (2003). Who maintains genetic diversity and how? Policy implications for agrobiodiversity management.. 24–26.1 indexed citations
16.
Sthapit, B. R., et al.. (2003). The historical development of in situ conservation in Vietnam: institutional arrangements for project implementation with multipartners.. 6–19.
17.
Jarvis, D. I., Larry R. Myer, Heather Klemick, et al.. (2000). A training guide for in situ conservation on-farm: version 1.. VTechWorks (Virginia Tech).51 indexed citations
18.
Joshi, K.D., et al.. (1998). Factors and processes behind the erosion of crop genetic diversity in Nepal.. 183–197.2 indexed citations
Sthapit, B. R.. (1990). Comparative performance of indigenous green manuring species on yields of rice. 11. 9–14.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.