This map shows the geographic impact of C. Garforth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Garforth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Garforth more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Garforth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Garforth. The network helps show where C. Garforth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Garforth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Garforth.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Garforth based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with C. Garforth. C. Garforth is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Oakley, Peter & C. Garforth. (2018). Guide to Extension Training. Medical Entomology and Zoology.10 indexed citations
Rehman, T., C. Garforth, K. McKemey, C. M. Yates, & Rakesh Rana. (2007). Farmers’ behavioural inclinations and their influence on the anticipated response to the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy in England.12 indexed citations
Garforth, C., et al.. (2006). Smallstock in Development.1 indexed citations
8.
Garforth, C. & T. Rehman. (2006). Research to understand and model the behaviour and motivations of farmers in responding to policy changes (England)..24 indexed citations
9.
Rana, R. B., et al.. (2005). Four-cell analysis as a decision-making tool for conservation of agrobiodiversity on-farm.. 15–24.4 indexed citations
10.
Garforth, C., T. Rehman, K. McKemey, & Rajneesh Rana. (2005). Livestock farmers' attitudes towards consequential loss insurance against notifiable diseases (Final report of a research study commissioned by the Livestock Strategy Division of the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)..3 indexed citations
11.
Garforth, C., et al.. (2004). Problems and prospects of farm forestry: a case of Chitwan district, Nepal. CentAUR (University of Reading).1 indexed citations
12.
Ramakrishnan, A. G., et al.. (2003). Diseases affecting cattle in the peri-urban regions of Pondicherry, India: report based on stakeholder's meetings..2 indexed citations
13.
Garforth, C., et al.. (2003). Information kiosk for dissemination of knowledge on cattle health: evaluation report based on preliminary findings of research..1 indexed citations
14.
Garforth, C., T. Rehman, K. McKemey, et al.. (2003). Improving the design of knowledge transfer strategies by understanding farmer attitudes and behaviours.47 indexed citations
15.
Garforth, C., et al.. (2003). Improving farmers' access to advice on land management: Lessons from case studies in developed countries.. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).24 indexed citations
16.
Ellis-Jones, J., et al.. (2002). Lessons learnt on scaling-up from case studies in Bolivia, Nepal and Uganda..3 indexed citations
17.
Garforth, C., et al.. (2001). Landless livestock farming: problems and prospects. Proceedings of the workshop held on 29 January 2001 at RAGACOVAS..
18.
Jones, Gwyn E. & C. Garforth. (1997). The history, development, and future of agricultural extension.72 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.