B. Boechat

534 citations
35 papers · 452 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

B. Boechat

35 papers receiving 425 citations

Peers

B. Boechat
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Condensed Matter Physics 388
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 113
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 258
  • Mathematical Physics 44
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 3
Replace Alba Theumann with:
Alba Theumann Brazil
B. Frank Canada
N. S. Branco Brazil
T. Yavors’kii Ukraine
Hidetsugu Kitatani Japan
A. A. Caparica Brazil
H. U. Everts Germany
D. Loison Germany
S. M. de Souza Brazil
J. H. Barry United States
B. Boechat relative to Alba Theumann Brazil Alba Theumann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Alba Theumann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by B. Boechat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. Boechat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Boechat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Boechat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. Boechat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Boechat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Boechat. The network helps show where B. Boechat may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 17 scholars most cited alongside B. Boechat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with B. Boechat Line = papers co-authored together B. Boechat links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201920
2 20177
3 20145
4 20146
5 20133
6 200716
7 20051
8 20033
9 200229
10 20011
11 20019
12 200113
13 20012
14 200023
15 20008
16 199627
17 19961
18 19941
19 19948
20 19909

About B. Boechat

B. Boechat is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mathematical Physics and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 35 papers that have together received 452 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theoretical and Computational Physics (29 papers), Quantum many-body systems (22 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (15 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (9 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (6 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (6 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (5 papers) and Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (388 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (113 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (258 citations), Mathematical Physics (44 citations) and Acoustics and Ultrasonics (3 citations). B. Boechat has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include M. A. Contínentino, N. S. Branco, A. Saguia, O. F. de Alcantara Bonfim, J. Florencio, Raimundo R. dos Santos, Tatiana G. Rappoport, J.C.S. Fernandes, R. B. Guimarães and F. C. Sá Barreto. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan and Physical review. E.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026