A. H. Lacerda
- Condensed Matter Physics top 0.5%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 1%
- Materials Chemistry
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 5%
- Co-authors
- P. C. CanfieldSergey L. Bud’koZ. IslamI. R. FisherJ. L. SarraoM. B. MapleM. S. TorikachviliC. H. Mielke
- Topics
- Rare-earth and actinide compounds (59 papers)Iron-based superconductors research (38 papers)Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (31 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilJapan
In The Last Decade
A. H. Lacerda
86 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Condensed Matter Physics 1.7k
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 1.5k
- Materials Chemistry 345
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 239
- Inorganic Chemistry 225
Countries citing papers authored by A. H. Lacerda
This map shows the geographic impact of A. H. Lacerda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. H. Lacerda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. H. Lacerda more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A. H. Lacerda
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. H. Lacerda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. H. Lacerda. The network helps show where A. H. Lacerda may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. H. Lacerda
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. H. Lacerda. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. H. Lacerda based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. H. Lacerda. A. H. Lacerda is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 36 | |
| 3 | 53 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 39 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 42 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 37 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 74 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 102 | |
| 17 | 106 | |
| 18 | 127 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 27 |
About A. H. Lacerda
A. H. Lacerda is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Geophysics, having authored 89 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rare-earth and actinide compounds (59 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (38 papers) and Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (31 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (1.7k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (1.5k citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (225 citations). A. H. Lacerda has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Japan. Frequent co-authors include P. C. Canfield, Sergey L. Bud’ko, Z. Islam, I. R. Fisher, J. L. Sarrao, M. B. Maple, M. S. Torikachvili, C. H. Mielke, S.L. Bud’ko and P. G. Pagliuso. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Journal of Applied Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.