J. Florencio

786 citations
46 papers · 648 indexed · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

J. Florencio

44 papers receiving 584 citations

Peers

J. Florencio
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Condensed Matter Physics 309
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 254
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 505
  • Computer Networks and Communications 63
  • Modeling and Simulation 12
Replace N. S. Tonchev with:
N. S. Tonchev Bulgaria
M. L. Chiofalo Italy
Peiqing Tong China
Carlos S. O. Yokoi Brazil
Chris Hamner United States
Hisashi Hiramoto Japan
S. V. Meshkov France
Magdalena A. Załuska–Kotur Poland
Nathan Argaman Israel
William A. Schwalm United States
J. Florencio relative to N. S. Tonchev Bulgaria N. S. Tonchev's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
N. S. Tonchev · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Florencio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Florencio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Florencio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Florencio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Florencio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Florencio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Florencio. The network helps show where J. Florencio may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 16 scholars most cited alongside J. Florencio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Florencio Line = papers co-authored together J. Florencio links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 201920
3 201512
4 20145
5 20146
6 20133
7 200610
8 200310
9 200316
10 20016
11 20008
12 20001
13 199929
14 199821
15 19958
16 19921
17 199211
18 198750
19 1985102
20 197639

About J. Florencio

J. Florencio is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Music and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 46 papers that have together received 648 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theoretical and Computational Physics (25 papers), Quantum many-body systems (20 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (11 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (9 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (5 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (5 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (5 papers) and Quantum and electron transport phenomena (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (309 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (254 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (505 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (63 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (12 citations). J. Florencio has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include O. F. de Alcantara Bonfim, F. C. Sá Barreto, J. M. Hong, K. A. Chao, B. Boechat, J. A. Plascak, Surajit Sen, Bernard A. Goodman, Tien T. Tsong and Dexin Ren. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Physical Review Letters, Physical review. E and Journal of Low Temperature Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026