Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: An organizing framework
2017490 citationsAurélien Acquier, Thibault Daudigeos et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Aurélien Acquier
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Aurélien Acquier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aurélien Acquier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aurélien Acquier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Aurélien Acquier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aurélien Acquier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aurélien Acquier. The network helps show where Aurélien Acquier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Aurélien Acquier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Aurélien Acquier.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Aurélien Acquier based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Aurélien Acquier. Aurélien Acquier is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Acquier, Aurélien, Thibault Daudigeos, & Bertrand Valiorgue. (2011). Responsabiliser les chaînes de valeur éclatées. 167–183.2 indexed citations
9.
Acquier, Aurélien, et al.. (2011). Standards and Innovation in Emerging Fields: Pushing Breakthrough Innovation or Enrolling Actors?: An Analysis of Eco-District Standards in France and Denmark. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1–33.1 indexed citations
10.
Acquier, Aurélien, Jean‐Pascal Gond, & Jean Pasquero. (2011). Rediscovering Howard R. Bowen’s Legacy. Business & Society. 50(4). 607–646.71 indexed citations
Boxenbaum, Eva, et al.. (2010). INNOVATION IN SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION: ECO-CITIES AND SOCIAL HOUSING IN FRANCE AND DENMARK. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1–50.1 indexed citations
Acquier, Aurélien & Franck Aggeri. (2008). Entrepreneuriat institutionnel et apprentissages collectifs. Le cas de la Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 12(2). 49–63.8 indexed citations
Acquier, Aurélien & Jean‐Pascal Gond. (2007). Aux sources de la responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise: à la (re)découverte d’un ouvrage fondateur, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman d’Howard Bowen L’impact des privatisations sur la performance des entreprises françaises. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 10(2). 5–35.5 indexed citations
19.
Aggeri, Franck & Aurélien Acquier. (2005). La théorie des stakeholders permet-elle de rendre compte des pratiques d'entreprise en matière de RSE ?. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 17.6 indexed citations
20.
Aggeri, Franck, et al.. (2005). Organiser le développement durable. 278.15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.