Audrey Swift

13 papers receiving 287 citations

Peers

Audrey Swift
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 98
  • Health 143
  • Applied Psychology 31
  • Social Psychology 93
  • Demography 41
Replace E Gjonça with:
E Gjonça United Kingdom
Joanna Dykes United Kingdom
Masami Hasebe Japan
Bettina Stenbock‐Hult Finland
Nicky Kime United Kingdom
Ina Schöllgen Germany
Nynke Frieswijk Netherlands
Menglian Wu China
Zhihong Zhen China
Debra Sheets Canada
Audrey Swift relative to E Gjonça United Kingdom E Gjonça's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
E Gjonça · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Audrey Swift

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Audrey Swift's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Audrey Swift with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Audrey Swift more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Audrey Swift

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Audrey Swift. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Audrey Swift. The network helps show where Audrey Swift may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Audrey Swift, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Audrey Swift Line = papers co-authored together Audrey Swift links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2009144
2 201343
3 200840
4 200729
5 201316
6 200812
7 202011
8 20187
9 20135
10 20223
11 20073
12 20211
13
A longitudinal analysis of control beliefs as moderators of the relationship between stress and well-being in later life
20041
14 20210

About Audrey Swift

Audrey Swift is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Health, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Physiology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aging and Gerontology Research (8 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (6 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (4 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers) and Retirement, Disability, and Employment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (98 citations), Health (143 citations), Applied Psychology (31 citations), Social Psychology (93 citations) and Demography (41 citations). Audrey Swift has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Judith G. Chipperfield, Nancy E. Newall, Joelle C. Ruthig, Raymond P. Perry, Robert B. Tate, Rodney A. Clifton, Tara L. Haynes, Verena Menec, Philip D. St. John and Shahin Shooshtari. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, Journal of Aging Studies, The Journal of Social Psychology, Canadian Geriatrics Journal and Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact