Bettina Stenbock‐Hult
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Health top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Clinical Psychology
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Anneli SarvimäkiNina SimonsenLena ZidénAud JohannessenHelena HörderAnne ClancyElisabeth FosseHelga Sól Ólafsdóttir
- Topics
- Health, psychology, and well-being (5 papers)Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers)Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Advanced NursingHealth Promotion International
In The Last Decade
Bettina Stenbock‐Hult
9 papers receiving 275 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- General Health Professions 173
- Health 111
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 60
- Clinical Psychology 48
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 42
Countries citing papers authored by Bettina Stenbock‐Hult
This map shows the geographic impact of Bettina Stenbock‐Hult's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bettina Stenbock‐Hult with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bettina Stenbock‐Hult more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bettina Stenbock‐Hult
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bettina Stenbock‐Hult. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bettina Stenbock‐Hult. The network helps show where Bettina Stenbock‐Hult may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bettina Stenbock‐Hult
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bettina Stenbock‐Hult. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bettina Stenbock‐Hult based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bettina Stenbock‐Hult. Bettina Stenbock‐Hult is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 41 | |
| 6 | 38 | |
| 7 | 45 | |
| 8 | Ikääntyminen ja mielen haavoittuvuus : haavoittuvuus riskinä ja voimavarana | 0 |
| 9 | Sårbarhet som utgångspunkt för etiken i äldrevården | 1 |
| 10 | 164 | |
| 11 | 9 |
About Bettina Stenbock‐Hult
Bettina Stenbock‐Hult is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 11 papers that have together received 311 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health, psychology, and well-being (5 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (42 citations), Health (111 citations) and Research and Theory (7 citations). Bettina Stenbock‐Hult has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, Sweden and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Anneli Sarvimäki, Nina Simonsen, Lena Zidén, Aud Johannessen, Helena Hörder, Anne Clancy, Anneli Sarvimäki, Elisabeth Fosse, Helga Sól Ólafsdóttir and Karin C. Ringsberg. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Health Promotion International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.