Bettina Stenbock‐Hult

459 total citations
11 papers, 311 citations indexed

About

Bettina Stenbock‐Hult is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Bettina Stenbock‐Hult has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 311 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in General Health Professions, 3 papers in Health and 2 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Bettina Stenbock‐Hult's work include Health, psychology, and well-being (5 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers). Bettina Stenbock‐Hult is often cited by papers focused on Health, psychology, and well-being (5 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers). Bettina Stenbock‐Hult collaborates with scholars based in Finland, Sweden and Denmark. Bettina Stenbock‐Hult's co-authors include Anneli Sarvimäki, Helena Hörder, Anne Clancy, Lena Zidén, Anneli Sarvimäki, Nina Simonsen, Aud Johannessen, Karin C. Ringsberg, Per Tillgren and Elisabeth Fosse and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Health Promotion International.

In The Last Decade

Bettina Stenbock‐Hult

9 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Bettina Stenbock‐Hult Finland 5 173 111 60 48 42 11 311
Nicky Kime United Kingdom 9 106 0.6× 84 0.8× 73 1.2× 43 0.9× 34 0.8× 31 348
Annie Carrier Canada 11 250 1.4× 86 0.8× 56 0.9× 47 1.0× 26 0.6× 50 453
Ini Grewal United Kingdom 4 182 1.1× 124 1.1× 34 0.6× 30 0.6× 31 0.7× 5 382
Kay Shannon New Zealand 10 180 1.0× 52 0.5× 48 0.8× 50 1.0× 27 0.6× 30 319
Helen Cooper United Kingdom 3 191 1.1× 217 2.0× 42 0.7× 28 0.6× 48 1.1× 5 353
Nuelle Novik Canada 10 192 1.1× 133 1.2× 24 0.4× 85 1.8× 43 1.0× 23 357
Qarin Lood Sweden 12 315 1.8× 84 0.8× 77 1.3× 64 1.3× 22 0.5× 34 387
Elaine Moody Canada 9 168 1.0× 55 0.5× 27 0.5× 27 0.6× 44 1.0× 41 302
Joanna Dykes United Kingdom 2 117 0.7× 127 1.1× 17 0.3× 22 0.5× 51 1.2× 3 301
Nicolas Kühne Switzerland 8 131 0.8× 57 0.5× 38 0.6× 58 1.2× 18 0.4× 31 309

Countries citing papers authored by Bettina Stenbock‐Hult

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bettina Stenbock‐Hult's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bettina Stenbock‐Hult with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bettina Stenbock‐Hult more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bettina Stenbock‐Hult

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bettina Stenbock‐Hult. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bettina Stenbock‐Hult. The network helps show where Bettina Stenbock‐Hult may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bettina Stenbock‐Hult

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bettina Stenbock‐Hult. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bettina Stenbock‐Hult based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bettina Stenbock‐Hult. Bettina Stenbock‐Hult is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Simonsen, Nina, Anneli Sarvimäki, Bettina Stenbock‐Hult, et al.. (2022). Nordic responses to covid-19 from a health promotion perspective. Health Promotion International. 38(4). 4 indexed citations
2.
Clancy, Anne, et al.. (2020). Nordiske sundhedsfremmende perspektiver på ældre menneskers deltagelse og tryghed. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 16(1). 19–19. 1 indexed citations
3.
Sarvimäki, Anneli, et al.. (2016). The vulnerability of family caregivers in relation to vulnerability as understood by nurses. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 31(1). 112–119. 4 indexed citations
4.
Stenbock‐Hult, Bettina, et al.. (2014). Vårdpersonalens syn på hälsofrämjande ledarskap. Nordic journal of nursing research. 34(1). 36–41. 4 indexed citations
5.
Sarvimäki, Anneli, Anne Clancy, Bettina Stenbock‐Hult, et al.. (2014). Home as a health promotion setting for older adults. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 42(15_suppl). 36–40. 41 indexed citations
6.
Sarvimäki, Anneli & Bettina Stenbock‐Hult. (2014). The meaning of vulnerability to older persons. Nursing Ethics. 23(4). 372–383. 38 indexed citations
7.
Stenbock‐Hult, Bettina & Anneli Sarvimäki. (2011). The meaning of vulnerability to nurses caring for older people. Nursing Ethics. 18(1). 31–41. 45 indexed citations
8.
Sarvimäki, Anneli, et al.. (2010). Ikääntyminen ja mielen haavoittuvuus : haavoittuvuus riskinä ja voimavarana. Doria (University of Helsinki).
9.
Sarvimäki, Anneli & Bettina Stenbock‐Hult. (2004). Sårbarhet som utgångspunkt för etiken i äldrevården. Doria (University of Helsinki). 1 indexed citations
10.
Sarvimäki, Anneli & Bettina Stenbock‐Hult. (2000). Quality of life in old age described as a sense of well‐being, meaning and value. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 32(4). 1025–1033. 164 indexed citations
11.
Sarvimäki, Anneli & Bettina Stenbock‐Hult. (1996). Intuition—A Problematic Form of Knowledge in Nursing. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 10(4). 234–241. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026