A.T. Garber
Impact in
-
- Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Neurology top 10%
- Neurological disorders and treatments
Papers in
-
- Connexins and lens biology 4
- Heat shock proteins research 2
- Fungal and yeast genetics research 2
- RNA Interference and Gene Delivery 2
- Genetics 5
- Animal Genetics and Reproduction 2
- Co-authors
- Jacqueline Segall (2 shared papers)R. Gold (4 shared papers)Oksana Suchowersky (2 shared papers)Mary Lou Klimek (2 shared papers)Lisa M. Graham (2 shared papers)Gordon H. Dixon (5 shared papers)Sarah Furtado (1 shared paper)N. Barry Rewcastle (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Experimental Eye Research (2 papers)Molecular and Cellular Biology (2 papers)Science (1 paper)The EMBO Journal (1 paper)Experimental Cell Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
A.T. Garber
18 papers receiving 497 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 162
- Neurology 97
- Molecular Biology 356
- Genetics 125
- Physiology 19
Countries citing papers authored by A.T. Garber
This map shows the geographic impact of A.T. Garber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.T. Garber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.T. Garber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A.T. Garber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.T. Garber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.T. Garber. The network helps show where A.T. Garber may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside A.T. Garber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 130 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 101 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 46 | |
| 4 | 1986 | 35 | |
| 5 | 1982 | 24 | |
| 6 | 1985 | 22 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 21 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 21 | |
| 9 | 1983 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 11 | 1986 | 14 | |
| 12 | 1989 | 14 | |
| 13 | Simple and efficient subtractive hybridization screening. | 1991 | 14 |
| 14 | 1984 | 12 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 11 | |
| 16 | 1979 | 10 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 3 |
About A.T. Garber
A.T. Garber is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology and Physiology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 513 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Connexins and lens biology (4 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (3 papers), Heat shock proteins research (2 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (2 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (2 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (2 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers) and RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (162 citations), Neurology (97 citations), Molecular Biology (356 citations), Genetics (125 citations) and Physiology (19 citations). A.T. Garber has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Jacqueline Segall, R. Gold, Oksana Suchowersky, Mary Lou Klimek, Lisa M. Graham, Gordon H. Dixon, Sarah Furtado, N. Barry Rewcastle, Melanie K. Webster and Christine A. Weaver. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Eye Research, Molecular and Cellular Biology, Science, The EMBO Journal and Experimental Cell Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.