Charles R. King
- Molecular Biology
- Immunology top 10%
- Genetics
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Joram PiatigorskyGary W. WoodJoan S. HuntR. Neil SchimkeMing C. WuGerald H. PrescottPeggy S. ZelenkaA.B. Chepelinsky
- Topics
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (8 papers)Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (7 papers)Photonic and Optical Devices (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaFrance
In The Last Decade
Charles R. King
55 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Molecular Biology 652
- Immunology 318
- Genetics 157
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 143
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 132
Countries citing papers authored by Charles R. King
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles R. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles R. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles R. King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles R. King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles R. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles R. King. The network helps show where Charles R. King may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles R. King
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles R. King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles R. King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles R. King. Charles R. King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Childbirth : changing ideas and practices in Britain and America 1600 to the present | 3 |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | Medical science as magic and metaphor: Thomas Mann's The Magic Mountain. | 1 |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 74 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 70 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | Revolutionary War, Guerilla Warfare, and International Law | 0 |
About Charles R. King
Charles R. King is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Urology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (8 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (7 papers) and Photonic and Optical Devices (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (132 citations), Immunology (318 citations) and Urology (65 citations). Charles R. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and France. Frequent co-authors include Joram Piatigorsky, Gary W. Wood, Joan S. Hunt, R. Neil Schimke, Ming C. Wu, Gerald H. Prescott, Peggy S. Zelenka, A.B. Chepelinsky, Toshimichi Shinohara and Philip R. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Cell and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.