Asif Ali Safeer
About
In The Last Decade
Asif Ali Safeer
29 papers receiving 525 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Sociology and Political Science 344
- Marketing 333
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 126
- Information Systems and Management 100
- Artificial Intelligence 59
Countries citing papers authored by Asif Ali Safeer
This map shows the geographic impact of Asif Ali Safeer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Asif Ali Safeer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asif Ali Safeer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Asif Ali Safeer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Asif Ali Safeer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Asif Ali Safeer. The network helps show where Asif Ali Safeer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Asif Ali Safeer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Asif Ali Safeer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Asif Ali Safeer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Asif Ali Safeer. Asif Ali Safeer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.