R.D. Macmillan

1.7k total citations
28 papers, 976 citations indexed

About

R.D. Macmillan is a scholar working on Surgery, Cancer Research and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, R.D. Macmillan has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 976 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Surgery, 15 papers in Cancer Research and 10 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in R.D. Macmillan's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (15 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (8 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (6 papers). R.D. Macmillan is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (15 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (8 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (6 papers). R.D. Macmillan collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. R.D. Macmillan's co-authors include Stephen J. McCulley, R. Cochrane, A.R.M. Wilson, SK Al‐Ghazal, Arnie Purushotham, Ching Wan Chan, W D George, E. Mallon, Piyush Durani and W.D. George and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Urology, British journal of surgery and Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery.

In The Last Decade

R.D. Macmillan

27 papers receiving 925 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
R.D. Macmillan United Kingdom	15	710	664	409	190	117	28	976
Stephen J. McCulley United Kingdom	23	1.4k 1.9×	688 1.0×	280 0.7×	230 1.2×	180 1.5×	37	1.5k
Isabelle Sarfati France	14	972 1.4×	704 1.1×	335 0.8×	232 1.2×	227 1.9×	28	1.1k
Luigi Cavanna Italy	10	218 0.3×	107 0.2×	198 0.5×	398 2.1×	54 0.5×	34	698
Alfred Fitoussi France	14	1.6k 2.3×	1.2k 1.8×	630 1.5×	195 1.0×	48 0.4×	32	1.9k
Herman Nussbaum United States	14	600 0.8×	130 0.2×	226 0.6×	454 2.4×	16 0.1×	54	1.0k
A Goupil France	17	312 0.4×	45 0.1×	160 0.4×	379 2.0×	34 0.3×	45	898
Etsuyo Ogo Japan	14	94 0.1×	150 0.2×	93 0.2×	213 1.1×	70 0.6×	69	534
Grant Carlson United States	9	300 0.4×	183 0.3×	71 0.2×	75 0.4×	19 0.2×	10	815
Colin Poulter United States	18	543 0.8×	169 0.3×	199 0.5×	372 2.0×	22 0.2×	29	961
Markus Falk Germany	15	364 0.5×	99 0.1×	51 0.1×	232 1.2×	31 0.3×	58	803

Countries citing papers authored by R.D. Macmillan

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.D. Macmillan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.D. Macmillan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.D. Macmillan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.D. Macmillan

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.D. Macmillan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.D. Macmillan. The network helps show where R.D. Macmillan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R.D. Macmillan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R.D. Macmillan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R.D. Macmillan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R.D. Macmillan. R.D. Macmillan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Asgeirsson, Kristjan, et al.. (2022). Off-the-shelf volume replacement in breast-conserving surgery: oxidized regenerated cellulose for upper inner quadrant defects. British journal of surgery. 109(5). 466–467. 2 indexed citations

Juvet, Tristan, et al.. (2019). The burden of urological disease in Zomba, Malawi: A needs assessment in a sub-Saharan tertiary care center. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 14(1). E6–E12. 8 indexed citations

Petit, Jean‐Yves, Patrick Maisonneuve, Nicole Rotmensz, et al.. (2015). Safety of Lipofilling in Patients with Breast Cancer. Clinics in Plastic Surgery. 42(3). 339–344. 32 indexed citations

Chan, Ching Wan, Stephen J. McCulley, & R.D. Macmillan. (2008). Autologous fat transfer – a review of the literature with a focus on breast cancer surgery. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 61(12). 1438–1448. 116 indexed citations

Rampaul, R.S., Øystein Dale, Murray D. Mitchell, et al.. (2008). Incidence of intramammary nodes in completion mastectomy specimens after axillary node sampling: Implications for breast conserving surgery. The Breast. 17(2). 195–198. 13 indexed citations

Rampaul, R.S., et al.. (2007). Use of FloSeal Matrix Hemostatic Agent in Partial Splenectomy After Penetrating Trauma. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 64(2). 507–508. 16 indexed citations

McCulley, Stephen J., Piyush Durani, & R.D. Macmillan. (2006). Therapeutic Mammaplasty for Centrally Located Breast Tumors. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 117(2). 366–373. 54 indexed citations

McCulley, Stephen J. & R.D. Macmillan. (2005). Planning and use of therapeutic mammoplasty—Nottingham approach. British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 58(7). 889–901. 85 indexed citations

Stevenson, Jonathan, R.D. Macmillan, Sarah Downey, Lorna Renshaw, & J. Michael Dixon. (2001). Factors affecting cosmetic outcome after breast conserving surgery. European Journal of Cancer. 37. 31–31. 7 indexed citations

10.

Macmillan, R.D.. (2000). Correspondence. The Mathematical Gazette. 84(500). 316–316. 2 indexed citations

11.

Malik, Hafiz, W.D. George, E. Mallon, et al.. (1999). Margin assessment by cavity shaving after breast-conserving surgery: analysis and follow-up of 543 patients. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 25(5). 464–469. 33 indexed citations

12.

Macmillan, R.D., Arnie Purushotham, E. Mallon, J. Love, & W.D. George. (1997). Tumour bed positivity predicts outcome after breast-conserving surgery.. PubMed. 84(11). 1559–62. 33 indexed citations

13.

Macmillan, R.D., Arnie Purushotham, E. Mallon, J. Love, & W.D. George. (1997). Tumour bed positivity predicts outcome after breast-conserving surgery. British journal of surgery. 84(11). 1559–1562. 20 indexed citations

14.

Chancellor, Michael B., David A. Rivas, Toyohiko Watanabe, et al.. (1996). Reversible Clinical Outcome After Sphincter Stent Removal. The Journal of Urology. 155(6). 1992–1994. 9 indexed citations

15.

Macmillan, R.D., Arnie Purushotham, & W D George. (1996). Local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer.. PubMed. 83(2). 149–55. 44 indexed citations

16.

Macmillan, R.D., Arnie Purushotham, & W D George. (1996). Local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. British journal of surgery. 83(2). 149–155. 4 indexed citations

17.

Macmillan, R.D.. (1992). Marshall McLuhan at the Mercy of His Commentators. Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 22(4). 475–491. 1 indexed citations

18.

Macmillan, R.D., et al.. (1988). Simultaneous aortic and renal artery reconstruction for acute arterial occlusion in solitary kidney. Urology. 31(1). 66–69. 2 indexed citations

19.

Macmillan, R.D. & Michael Robinette. (1985). Congenital arteriovenous malformation of kidney in pregnancy. Urology. 26(5). 441–445. 10 indexed citations

20.

Barkin, Martin, et al.. (1983). Urethrotomy under direct vision: the primary treatment for urethral stricture.. PubMed. 26(5). 430–1. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact