William R. Poller

21 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

Lumpectomy Compared with Lumpectomy and Radiation Therapy...199320262004201519931998200400600

Peers

William R. Poller
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Cancer Research 1.2k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 910
  • Oncology 801
  • Artificial Intelligence 472
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 419
Replace Ruud M. Pijnappel with:
Ruud M. Pijnappel Netherlands
Jacopo Nori Italy
Mary S. Newell United States
Suzanne B. Coopey United States
A.R.M. Wilson United Kingdom
H.C. Burrell United Kingdom
Joo Hee South Korea
Andy Evans United Kingdom
Peter M. Jokich United States
Kathy Schilling United States
William R. Poller relative to Ruud M. Pijnappel Netherlands Ruud M. Pijnappel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ruud M. Pijnappel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William R. Poller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William R. Poller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William R. Poller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William R. Poller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William R. Poller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William R. Poller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William R. Poller. The network helps show where William R. Poller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William R. Poller

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William R. Poller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William R. Poller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William R. Poller. William R. Poller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 23
2 1
3 18
4 4
5 7
6 146
7 48
8 50
9 3
10 222
11 51
12 37
13 36
14 28
15 42
16 1
17
Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17.breakdown →
615
18 1
19
Lumpectomy Compared with Lumpectomy and Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Intraductal Breast Cancerbreakdown →
618
20 4

About William R. Poller

William R. Poller is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 22 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include AI in cancer detection (11 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (7 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (1.2k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (910 citations) and Oncology (801 citations). William R. Poller has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Richard G. Margolese, Maureen Kavanah, Bernard Fisher, Joseph P. Costantino, Edwin R. Fisher, Norman Wolmark, D. Lawrence Wickerham, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, Melvin Deutsch and Nikolay Dimitrov. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Clinical Oncology and JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026