Apolonia E. Abramowicz

29 papers receiving 258 citations

Peers

Apolonia E. Abramowicz
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Developmental Neuroscience 52
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 56
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 46
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 63
  • Neurology 43
Replace Kimiko Fukui with:
Kimiko Fukui Japan
Marie-Agnès Docquier Belgium
Judith Dinsmore United Kingdom
Angela L. Du United States
Viet Nguyen United States
Kohei Murao Japan
R. Heylen Belgium
Maria Rosa Calvi Italy
Thibaut Triglia France
Luca Titi Italy
Apolonia E. Abramowicz relative to Kimiko Fukui Japan Kimiko Fukui's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Kimiko Fukui · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Apolonia E. Abramowicz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Apolonia E. Abramowicz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Apolonia E. Abramowicz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Apolonia E. Abramowicz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Apolonia E. Abramowicz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Apolonia E. Abramowicz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Apolonia E. Abramowicz. The network helps show where Apolonia E. Abramowicz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Apolonia E. Abramowicz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Apolonia E. Abramowicz Line = papers co-authored together Apolonia E. Abramowicz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199252
2 201134
3 202118
4 196418
5 201216
6 199115
7 201613
8 202112
9 202111
10 201711
11 202211
12 20189
13 19899
14 19949
15 20174
16 20164
17 20213
18 19893
19 20223
20 20232

About Apolonia E. Abramowicz

Apolonia E. Abramowicz is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 36 papers that have together received 271 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (7 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (7 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (5 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (5 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (4 papers) and Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (52 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (56 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (46 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (63 citations) and Neurology (43 citations). Apolonia E. Abramowicz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Ira S. Kass, James E. Cottrell, Geoffrey Chambers, Arthur Wang, Mark F. Abel, Ilya Sabsovich, Andrea Doronzio, Elisabetta Stazi, Ellise Delphin and Meic H. Schmidt. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, World Neurosurgery, Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, Journal of surgical education and The International Journal of Spine Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact