Philip D. Lumb
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 0.1%
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 0.1%
- Surgery top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Developmental Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Stanley A. NasrawayJudith JacobiMichael J. MurrayScott B. GroudineH. Scott BjerkeDavid CrippenDorrie K. FontainePaul E. Marik
- Topics
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (19 papers)Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (10 papers)Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (9 papers)
- Cited by
- Critical Care and Intensive Care MedicineAnesthesiology and Pain MedicineDevelopmental Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Philip D. Lumb
51 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 1.5k
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 1.5k
- Surgery 840
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 661
- Developmental Neuroscience 611
Countries citing papers authored by Philip D. Lumb
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip D. Lumb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip D. Lumb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip D. Lumb more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip D. Lumb
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip D. Lumb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip D. Lumb. The network helps show where Philip D. Lumb may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip D. Lumb
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip D. Lumb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip D. Lumb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip D. Lumb. Philip D. Lumb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | 52 | |
| 8 | 74 | |
| 9 | 145 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 90 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 263 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 29 | |
| 18 | Complications in critical care medicine | 11 |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Philip D. Lumb
Philip D. Lumb is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 56 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (19 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (10 papers) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (1.5k citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (1.5k citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (611 citations). Philip D. Lumb has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stanley A. Nasraway, Judith Jacobi, Michael J. Murray, Scott B. Groudine, H. Scott Bjerke, David Crippen, Dorrie K. Fontaine, Paul E. Marik, Ruth M. Kelleher and Barry D. Fuchs. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Surgery, Journal of Applied Physiology and CHEST Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.