Anwesha Nag
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 12
- Plant Science top 5%
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 3
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 2
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 2
-
- Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment 6
-
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer 4
-
- Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting 3
-
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 2
- Co-authors
- Thomas JackStacey KingAaron R. ThornerMatthew MeyersonMatthew D. DucarBrian D. CromptonNaomi CurrimjeeRameen Beroukhim
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Nature Genetics (2 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChileUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Anwesha Nag
24 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Cancer Research 249
- Plant Science 486
- Molecular Biology 876
- Aging 17
- Business and International Management 16
Countries citing papers authored by Anwesha Nag
This map shows the geographic impact of Anwesha Nag's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anwesha Nag with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anwesha Nag more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anwesha Nag
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anwesha Nag. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anwesha Nag. The network helps show where Anwesha Nag may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anwesha Nag, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 16 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 71 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 206 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 84 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 97 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 65 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 367 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 43 |
About Anwesha Nag
Anwesha Nag is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (12 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (4 papers), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (3 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (3 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers) and Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (249 citations), Plant Science (486 citations) and Molecular Biology (876 citations). Anwesha Nag has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Jack, Stacey King, Aaron R. Thorner, Matthew Meyerson, Matthew D. Ducar, Brian D. Crompton, Naomi Currimjee, Rameen Beroukhim, Mai Abdusamad and Sangita Pal. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Genetics and Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.