Antonio Penta

870 citations
35 papers · 423 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Antonio Penta

32 papers receiving 399 citations

Peers

Antonio Penta
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • General Decision Sciences 44
  • Safety Research 154
  • Management Science and Operations Research 216
  • Economics and Econometrics 108
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 74
Replace Daniel Friedman with:
Daniel Friedman United States
Leslie R. Fine United States
Goran Radanović Switzerland
Ulrich Schwalbe Germany
Chien-Ju Ho United States
Marija Slavkovik Norway
Yunqi Li United States
Alexandros Psomas United States
László Gyarmati Hungary
Antonio Penta relative to Daniel Friedman United States Daniel Friedman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18.5×
Daniel Friedman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Antonio Penta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Antonio Penta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antonio Penta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antonio Penta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Antonio Penta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Antonio Penta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Antonio Penta. The network helps show where Antonio Penta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Antonio Penta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Antonio Penta Line = papers co-authored together Antonio Penta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015104
2 201450
3 201726
4 201125
5 201523
6 202022
7 201221
8 200819
9 202019
10 200816
11 201311
12 201210
13 200810
14 20099
15 20078
16 20116
17 20085
18 20085
19 20195
20 20084

About Antonio Penta

Antonio Penta is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Artificial Intelligence, Safety Research, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Applications (12 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (10 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (9 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (8 papers), Economic theories and models (7 papers), Video Analysis and Summarization (5 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (4 papers) and Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (44 citations), Safety Research (154 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (216 citations), Economics and Econometrics (108 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (74 citations). Antonio Penta has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Larbi Chrifi‐Alaoui, Antonio Picariello, Vincenzo Moscato, Flora Amato, Antonino Mazzeo, Pierpaolo Battigalli, Māris Goldmanis, Francesco Decarolis, Carlo Sansone and Ruggero G. Pensa. Their work appears in journals such as Theoretical Economics, Journal of Economic Theory, The Review of Economic Studies, Management Science and Knowledge-Based Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact