António Lobo
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality top 5%
- Automotive Engineering top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Transportation top 10%
- Building and Construction top 10%
- Co-authors
- António CoutoSara FerreiraLiliana CunhaIsabel IglesiasTiago MonteiroPedro Lopes de MeloIsabel Sousa‐PintoPierluigi Coppola
- Topics
- Traffic and Road Safety (14 papers)Transportation Planning and Optimization (12 papers)Urban Transport and Accessibility (10 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaMarine Pollution BulletinSensors
- Partner nations
- PortugalItalyNetherlands
In The Last Decade
António Lobo
35 papers receiving 260 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 108
- Automotive Engineering 85
- Social Psychology 65
- Transportation 62
- Building and Construction 54
Countries citing papers authored by António Lobo
This map shows the geographic impact of António Lobo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by António Lobo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites António Lobo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by António Lobo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by António Lobo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by António Lobo. The network helps show where António Lobo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of António Lobo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of António Lobo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of António Lobo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with António Lobo. António Lobo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | Implementation of Electronic Toll Collection in Freeways According to the Macroeconomic Situation | 1 |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About António Lobo
António Lobo is a scholar working on Transportation, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Automotive Engineering, having authored 38 papers that have together received 268 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traffic and Road Safety (14 papers), Transportation Planning and Optimization (12 papers) and Urban Transport and Accessibility (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (108 citations), Transportation (62 citations) and Automotive Engineering (85 citations). António Lobo has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Italy and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include António Couto, Sara Ferreira, Liliana Cunha, Isabel Iglesias, Tiago Monteiro, Pedro Lopes de Melo, Isabel Sousa‐Pinto, Pierluigi Coppola, Sandra Melo and Sara C. Antunes. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Marine Pollution Bulletin and Sensors.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.