Biagio D’Aniello
- Genetics top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Reproductive Medicine top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Small Animals top 1%
- Co-authors
- Anna ScandurraClaudia PinelliRakesh K. RastogiAlessandra AlterisioMassimo AriaMaria FiorentinoGün R. SeminEmanuela Prato‐Previde
- Topics
- Human-Animal Interaction Studies (39 papers)Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (23 papers)Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (19 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPLoS ONEThe Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Biagio D’Aniello
104 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
- Genetics 836
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 453
- Reproductive Medicine 421
- Social Psychology 414
- Small Animals 333
Countries citing papers authored by Biagio D’Aniello
This map shows the geographic impact of Biagio D’Aniello's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Biagio D’Aniello with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biagio D’Aniello more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Biagio D’Aniello
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Biagio D’Aniello. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Biagio D’Aniello. The network helps show where Biagio D’Aniello may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Biagio D’Aniello
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Biagio D’Aniello. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Biagio D’Aniello based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Biagio D’Aniello. Biagio D’Aniello is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 93 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 31 | |
| 15 | 47 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 93 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Biagio D’Aniello
Biagio D’Aniello is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Reproductive Medicine and Small Animals, having authored 108 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (39 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (23 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (271 citations), Reproductive Medicine (421 citations) and Small Animals (333 citations). Biagio D’Aniello has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Anna Scandurra, Claudia Pinelli, Rakesh K. Rastogi, Alessandra Alterisio, Massimo Aria, Maria Fiorentino, Gün R. Semin, Emanuela Prato‐Previde, Paola Valsecchi and M. Di Meglio. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and The Journal of Comparative Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.