Antoni Bosch‐Domènech
- Safety Research top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 5%
- General Decision Sciences top 2%
- Finance top 10%
- Co-authors
- Rosemarie NagelJosé García MontalvoAlbert SatorraJoaquim SilvestreNicolaas J. VriendPablo Brañas‐GarzaAntonio M. EspínThomas Meißner
- Topics
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (9 papers)Economic theories and models (5 papers)Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Antoni Bosch‐Domènech
15 papers receiving 498 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Safety Research 264
- Economics and Econometrics 202
- Management Science and Operations Research 174
- General Decision Sciences 157
- Finance 77
Countries citing papers authored by Antoni Bosch‐Domènech
This map shows the geographic impact of Antoni Bosch‐Domènech's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antoni Bosch‐Domènech with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antoni Bosch‐Domènech more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Antoni Bosch‐Domènech
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Antoni Bosch‐Domènech. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Antoni Bosch‐Domènech. The network helps show where Antoni Bosch‐Domènech may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Antoni Bosch‐Domènech
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Antoni Bosch‐Domènech. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Antoni Bosch‐Domènech based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Antoni Bosch‐Domènech. Antoni Bosch‐Domènech is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 78 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | 53 | |
| 10 | 192 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 5 |
About Antoni Bosch‐Domènech
Antoni Bosch‐Domènech is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Safety Research and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 527 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (9 papers), Economic theories and models (5 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (157 citations), Safety Research (264 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (174 citations). Antoni Bosch‐Domènech has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rosemarie Nagel, José García Montalvo, Albert Satorra, Joaquim Silvestre, Nicolaas J. Vriend, Pablo Brañas‐Garza, Antonio M. Espín, Thomas Meißner, Shyam Sunder and Juan V. Sanchez‐Andrés. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, The Economic Journal and Psychoneuroendocrinology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.