Luís Santos‐Pinto

703 total citations
34 papers, 380 citations indexed

About

Luís Santos‐Pinto is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research and General Decision Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, Luís Santos‐Pinto has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 380 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 22 papers in Safety Research and 12 papers in General Decision Sciences. Recurrent topics in Luís Santos‐Pinto's work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (22 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (12 papers) and Economic theories and models (7 papers). Luís Santos‐Pinto is often cited by papers focused on Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (22 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (12 papers) and Economic theories and models (7 papers). Luís Santos‐Pinto collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, France and Portugal. Luís Santos‐Pinto's co-authors include Joel Sobel, Thomas B. Åstebro, José Mata, Adrian Bruhin, Daniel Carvalho, Young-Joon Park, Catherine Roux, Christian Thöni, Petros G. Sekeris and Luca David Opromolla and has published in prestigious journals such as American Economic Review, The Economic Journal and Journal of Labor Economics.

In The Last Decade

Luís Santos‐Pinto

30 papers receiving 357 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Luís Santos‐Pinto Switzerland 10 188 162 140 99 58 34 380
Sabine Kröger Canada 11 167 0.9× 143 0.9× 138 1.0× 63 0.6× 64 1.1× 29 350
Doron Sonsino Israel 13 255 1.4× 197 1.2× 205 1.5× 159 1.6× 77 1.3× 41 504
Sascha Füllbrunn Netherlands 11 186 1.0× 172 1.1× 152 1.1× 65 0.7× 158 2.7× 32 427
Florian Lindner Austria 11 227 1.2× 218 1.3× 193 1.4× 86 0.9× 167 2.9× 19 473
Vital Anderhub Germany 9 266 1.4× 284 1.8× 153 1.1× 105 1.1× 27 0.5× 14 517
Roberto Hernán González United States 7 161 0.9× 101 0.6× 100 0.7× 67 0.7× 17 0.3× 11 278
Emel Filiz‐Ozbay United States 9 218 1.2× 175 1.1× 112 0.8× 188 1.9× 17 0.3× 23 417
Julius Pahlke Germany 5 138 0.7× 96 0.6× 163 1.2× 41 0.4× 24 0.4× 5 276
Oleg Korenok United States 13 181 1.0× 203 1.3× 72 0.5× 49 0.5× 83 1.4× 35 404
Petra Nieken Germany 11 159 0.8× 120 0.7× 56 0.4× 48 0.5× 12 0.2× 37 325

Countries citing papers authored by Luís Santos‐Pinto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luís Santos‐Pinto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luís Santos‐Pinto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luís Santos‐Pinto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luís Santos‐Pinto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luís Santos‐Pinto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luís Santos‐Pinto. The network helps show where Luís Santos‐Pinto may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luís Santos‐Pinto

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luís Santos‐Pinto. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luís Santos‐Pinto based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luís Santos‐Pinto. Luís Santos‐Pinto is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bruhin, Adrian, et al.. (2024). The role of self-confidence in teamwork: experimental evidence. Experimental Economics. 27(3). 687–712. 4 indexed citations
2.
Santos‐Pinto, Luís & Petros G. Sekeris. (2024). How confidence heterogeneity shapes effort and performance in tournaments and contests. Journal of Mathematical Economics. 116. 103069–103069. 1 indexed citations
3.
Santos‐Pinto, Luís, et al.. (2023). Experimental evidence on the transmission of honesty and dishonesty: A stairway to heaven and a highway to hell. Economics Letters. 231. 111257–111257. 1 indexed citations
4.
Bruhin, Adrian, et al.. (2022). Risk and rationality: The relative importance of probability weighting and choice set dependence. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 65(2). 139–184. 1 indexed citations
5.
Santos‐Pinto, Luís & Petros G. Sekeris. (2022). Overconfidence in Tullock Contests. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
6.
Santos‐Pinto, Luís, et al.. (2020). Overconfidence and Timing of Entry. Games. 11(4). 44–44. 1 indexed citations
7.
Santos‐Pinto, Luís, et al.. (2017). ENTREPRENEURIAL OPTIMISM AND THE MARKET FOR NEW ISSUES. International Economic Review. 58(2). 383–419. 1 indexed citations
8.
Santos‐Pinto, Luís, Adrian Bruhin, José Mata, & Thomas B. Åstebro. (2015). Detecting heterogeneous risk attitudes with mixed gambles. Theory and Decision. 79(4). 573–600. 10 indexed citations
9.
Åstebro, Thomas B., José Mata, & Luís Santos‐Pinto. (2014). Skewness seeking: risk loving, optimism or overweighting of small probabilities?. Theory and Decision. 78(2). 189–208. 52 indexed citations
10.
Santos‐Pinto, Luís, et al.. (2013). Tacit Collusion under Fairness and Reciprocity. Games. 4(1). 50–65. 6 indexed citations
11.
Santos‐Pinto, Luís. (2012). Labor Market Signaling and Self-Confidence: Wage Compression and the Gender Pay Gap. Journal of Labor Economics. 30(4). 873–914. 13 indexed citations
12.
Santos‐Pinto, Luís, et al.. (2011). Self-Confidence and Teamwork: An Experimental Test. SSRN Electronic Journal. 8 indexed citations
13.
Åstebro, Thomas B., José Mata, & Luís Santos‐Pinto. (2010). Does Preference for Skew Explain Entrepreneurship? Evidence from the Laboratory. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6 indexed citations
14.
Åstebro, Thomas B., José Mata, & Luís Santos‐Pinto. (2009). Preference for Skew in Lotteries: Evidence from the Laboratory. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 2 indexed citations
15.
Santos‐Pinto, Luís. (2008). Making sense of the experimental evidence on endogenous timing in duopoly markets. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 68(3-4). 657–666. 11 indexed citations
16.
Santos‐Pinto, Luís. (2008). Positive Self‐image and Incentives in Organisations. The Economic Journal. 118(531). 1315–1332. 51 indexed citations
17.
Santos‐Pinto, Luís. (2007). Positive Self-Image in Tournaments. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
18.
Santos‐Pinto, Luís. (2006). Reciprocity, Inequity Aversion, and Oligopolistic Competition. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations
19.
Santos‐Pinto, Luís & Joel Sobel. (2005). A Model of Positive Self-Image in Subjective Assessments. American Economic Review. 95(5). 1386–1402. 92 indexed citations
20.
Santos‐Pinto, Luís & Young-Joon Park. (2004). Forecasts of relative performance in tournaments: evidence from the field. MPRA Paper. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sabine Kröger Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Doron Sonsino Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sascha Füllbrunn Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Florian Lindner Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Vital Anderhub Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Roberto Hernán González Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Emel Filiz‐Ozbay Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Julius Pahlke Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Oleg Korenok Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Petra Nieken
Rankless by CCL
2026