Anthony S. Gillies
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 4
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 7
- Language and Linguistics top 2%
- Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation 4
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 12
- Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation 6
- Speech and dialogue systems 2
-
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies 4
-
- Game Theory and Applications 3
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)Behavioral and Brain Sciences (1 paper)The Philosophical Review (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Anthony S. Gillies
20 papers receiving 544 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Philosophy 336
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 312
- Language and Linguistics 201
- History and Philosophy of Science 62
- Artificial Intelligence 377
Countries citing papers authored by Anthony S. Gillies
This map shows the geographic impact of Anthony S. Gillies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthony S. Gillies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthony S. Gillies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anthony S. Gillies
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthony S. Gillies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthony S. Gillies. The network helps show where Anthony S. Gillies may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Anthony S. Gillies, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 38 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 146 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 58 | |
| 8 | Epistemic Conditions and Social Preferences in Trust Games | 2008 | 3 |
| 9 | 2007 | 94 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 99 | |
| 11 | Epistemic Modality for Dummies | 2006 | 1 |
| 12 | 2005 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 85 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 18 | |
| 16 | Rational belief change | 2001 | 5 |
| 17 | 2001 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 25 | |
| 19 | 2000 | 25 | |
| 20 | 1961 | 3 |
About Anthony S. Gillies
Anthony S. Gillies is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research and Philosophy, having authored 21 papers that have together received 639 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (12 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (6 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers), Game Theory and Applications (3 papers) and Speech and dialogue systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (336 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (312 citations) and Language and Linguistics (201 citations). Anthony S. Gillies has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Kai von Fintel, John L. Pollock, Nicholas Asher, Mary L. Rigdon and Eric Dietrich. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Behavioral and Brain Sciences and The Philosophical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.