Anthony M. Bean

1.3k citations
11 papers · 185 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Anthony M. Bean

8 papers receiving 168 citations

Peers

Anthony M. Bean
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Applied Psychology 23
  • Sociology and Political Science 157
  • Clinical Psychology 71
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 29
  • Education 55
Replace Jano Ramos‐Diaz with:
Jano Ramos‐Diaz Peru
Tobias Kärner Germany
James W. Forgan United States
M. Gebauer Germany
Nikos Xanidis United Kingdom
David Schultner Netherlands
Susanne Jurkowski Germany
Jason D. Ferrell United States
Müjde Peker Türkiye
Gino Casale Germany
Anthony M. Bean relative to Jano Ramos‐Diaz Peru Jano Ramos‐Diaz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Jano Ramos‐Diaz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anthony M. Bean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anthony M. Bean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthony M. Bean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthony M. Bean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anthony M. Bean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthony M. Bean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthony M. Bean. The network helps show where Anthony M. Bean may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Anthony M. Bean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anthony M. Bean Line = papers co-authored together Anthony M. Bean links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2017102
2 201450
3 20199
4 20168
5 20187
6 20185
7 20163
8 20191
9 20230
10 20220
11 20220

About Anthony M. Bean

Anthony M. Bean is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Education and Applied Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 185 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (10 papers), Digital Games and Media (7 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers), Child Therapy and Development (2 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (2 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (1 paper) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (23 citations), Sociology and Political Science (157 citations), Clinical Psychology (71 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (29 citations) and Education (55 citations). Anthony M. Bean has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Christopher J. Ferguson, Rune Kristian Lundedal Nielsen, Gary Groth‐Marnat, Antonius J. van Rooij, Lauren S. Ferro and João Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology of Popular Media Culture, Professional Psychology Research and Practice, Psychology of Popular Media, Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento and Entertainment Computing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact