Anthony Bruton
Impact in
- Literature and Literary Theory top 0.5%
- Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Language and Linguistics top 0.5%
- EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Papers in
-
- EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning 20
- Lexicography and Language Studies 2
-
- Second Language Learning and Teaching 19
- Discourse Analysis in Language Studies 5
- Co-authors
- Virginia Samuda (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Anthony Bruton
34 papers receiving 846 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Literature and Literary Theory 755
- Language and Linguistics 578
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 360
- Linguistics and Language 79
- Education 193
Countries citing papers authored by Anthony Bruton
This map shows the geographic impact of Anthony Bruton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthony Bruton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthony Bruton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anthony Bruton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthony Bruton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthony Bruton. The network helps show where Anthony Bruton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Anthony Bruton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 190 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 141 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 70 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 68 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 62 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 56 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 56 | |
| 8 | 1980 | 46 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 46 | |
| 10 | Process Writing and Communicative-Task-Based Instruction: Many Common Features, but More Common Limitations? | 2005 | 37 |
| 11 | 2010 | 36 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 30 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 28 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 27 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 25 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 12 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2000 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 5 |
About Anthony Bruton
Anthony Bruton is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Linguistics and Language, having authored 39 papers that have together received 993 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (20 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (19 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (16 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (5 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (5 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (4 papers), Text Readability and Simplification (3 papers) and Lexicography and Language Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (755 citations), Language and Linguistics (578 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (360 citations), Linguistics and Language (79 citations) and Education (193 citations). Anthony Bruton has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Singapore and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Virginia Samuda. Their work appears in journals such as System, ELT Journal, TESOL Quarterly, RELC Journal and Applied Linguistics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.