Karen Glaser
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Demography top 2%
- Health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Mohammadreza HojatGiorgio Di GessaJ. Jon VeloskiAnthea TinkerEmily GrundyM.I. Broese Van GroenouDouglas A. WolfCecilia Tomassini
- Topics
- EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (10 papers)Innovations in Medical Education (7 papers)Medical Education and Admissions (6 papers)
- Cited by
- HealthFamily PracticeDemography
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Karen Glaser
26 papers receiving 821 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- General Health Professions 323
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 273
- Sociology and Political Science 271
- Demography 223
- Health 202
Countries citing papers authored by Karen Glaser
This map shows the geographic impact of Karen Glaser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen Glaser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen Glaser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Karen Glaser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen Glaser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen Glaser. The network helps show where Karen Glaser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen Glaser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen Glaser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen Glaser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karen Glaser. Karen Glaser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 142 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | Relationships between scores on the Jefferson Scale of physician empathy, patient perceptions of physician empathy, and humanistic approaches to patient care: a validity study. | 116 |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 110 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 87 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Karen Glaser
Karen Glaser is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 887 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (10 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (7 papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (202 citations), Family Practice (51 citations) and Demography (223 citations). Karen Glaser has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mohammadreza Hojat, Giorgio Di Gessa, J. Jon Veloski, Anthea Tinker, Emily Grundy, M.I. Broese Van Groenou, Douglas A. Wolf, Cecilia Tomassini, Gang Xu and Fred W. Markham. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Academic Medicine and Age and Ageing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.